Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know what you're getting at Alan, and also that you're being a bit tongue in cheek, but just in case people take it literally.

So, everyone has a fridge, but that doesn't really define not being poor does it.

http://www.poverty.org.uk/01/index.shtml








So things getting a leeeetle bit later, but...

I know Alan likes a good debate and I should know better - but:


"Intellectual superiority and economic inferiority often go hand in hand"

Based on what analysis and study? Is it aimed at anyone on here?


"Whilst this debate is of some merit, the ultimate pull the rug out question for those who moan about the city bonuses is 'what would you do about it?' invariably their answers would cripple the economy and spoil the party for everyone"

It may be the ultimate question but it would be rash to try and answer it without making the journey first. The first question being "Is everything hunky dory or is there anything we might want to address in this world of ours?"

If we see people suffering genuine hardship is there nothing we want to do?

Is sharing resources that difficult for people?

Business always complains that any new rules would cripple it (and did so back in the slave days.... bless em)


"It's a tough life lesson. Some people are more able, others are more priveleged and lots work harder. If you have a specific gripe about your own situation then I expect it can be addressed. If you are just expressing an empathy for a disenfrachised underclass then don't bother - they wouldn't extend you the same courtesy."

Oooh look - another generalisation. Says who Alan? History shows the progress made by mankind when it co-operates rather than competes. And looking for gratitude isn't th eorder of the day in any case.


"The wealth gap problem is one created and propagated because no one is poor enough to worry about any more. If the price of making everyone rich enough to feed and clothe themselves is that a few people appear to be ludicrously wealthy then so be it."

"noone" is poor enough? sheesh. Poverty doesn't begin and end at clothes and food (although that was the case for most of our history)

It doesn't take the worlds most bleeding heart to sit in an office at 6pm when the cleaners come in, speak to them, realise that most of them are doing several different jobs, for perfectly "repectable" agencies who try and dock every single penny they can for the most petty reasons (toiletbreaks etc) . Pennies that make a difference to their lives. The 6 and 7 figure earners at the top can indulge as much times as they want and not suffer a penny deduction - and think "hang on - something's not right here".


"We've never had it so good."

By which you mean - let them eat cake I assume


and finally: "until something better is found"

Ain't noone going to stumble upon it. The money floats to the top by aggression. If a better way was found it would be ruthlessly stamped out to protect the interests of those concerned. Rights are never granted they are always fought for

If anyone out there is feeling a little down, they're more than welcome to come an look in my 'Enron Memorabilia' drawer.

I have two flashing yo-yos, some 'stress relief' squeezers, bouncey balls, a musical pen and an "ENRON - MOVIN'' ON UP" torch.


Always cheers me up anyway.

A city boy, Kenny moved to the country and bought a donkey from an old farmer for $100. The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day.

The next day the farmer drove up and said: "Sorry son, but I have some bad news, the donkey died."

Kenny replied: "Well then, just give me my money back."

The farmer said: "Can't do that, I went and spent it already."

Kenny said: "OK then, at least give me the donkey."

The farmer asked: "What ye gonna do with him."

Kenny: "I'm going to raffle him off."

Farmer: "You can't raffle off a dead donkey."

Kenny: "Sure I can. Watch me. I just won't tell anybody he is dead."

A month later the farmer met up with Kenny and asked: "What happened with that dead donkey?"

Kenny: "I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars a piece and made a profit of $900."

Farmer: "Didn't anyone complain?"

Kenny: "Just the guy who won. So I gave him his two dollars back."

Kenny grew up and eventually became the chairman of Enron.


Not quite in line with this thread and I guess it should be in the jokes section but just the mere mention of Enron and I couldn't help myself. Hope it lightened things up a bit.

"It also seems that the people most concerned about 'the poor' are middle class Guardian readers who moan about the system because they themselves made a spurious career choice and slipped down the relative wealth league tables that they hold so dear."


Um, do you mean me?


I do regret my "spurious" career. Even though it suits my skills, I'm good at it, I enjoy it and I'm doing well, alas, if only I was a city boy. Then I could earn bucketloads of money and have no life!!! Great!

>People forget that for 70 years Enron was a successful company that employed and therefore fed and clothed a huge number of

> hard working people.


Indeed, when it was a real company producing a real commodity. Then it bought into the whole limitless greed is good thing (probably thanks to that force for evil, McKinsey & Company), people did anything to secure their bonuses, risk-managers were drummed out of the business because they didn't bring in an income and the rest, is as they say, history.

People don't forget that Enron was a successful company - but they are entitle to make the obvious point that so many hard-working people were thrown out of work was because of the greed and arrogance of the senior employees - which is exactly what we are talking about

The system might indeed rely on those qualities - but the things that genuinely enrich our lives (and not just the money which greases the wheels) tend not to be generated by the system. Worse they can be flattened by it


Posting about relative merits of caffeine based drinks is not a sign of champagne-soci-alism. I believe they do it in Norway even!


You have a bee in your bonnet about the Guardian today don't you. Although there may be some truth in your statement about it's hang-ups in relation to the Mail. The difference being (as you KNOW) that having a pop at executive pay is, at most, going to affect a very small number of, and already very privileged, individuals (however hard they may have worked). And by affect I mean, not at all


The Mail's hysteria about immigration on the other hand, has a very real consequence for a lot of people who have already had a fair bit to deal with in life

If we're going to get batey about excessive pay I might be tempted to bring up Blair's purported 7 figure advance for his autobiography. Funnily enough I thought there were laws in this country about not profiting from criminal enterprises.


Can I drawing-room this thread?

It's also worth remembering that those affected by 'Guardian-type hysteria' are less likely to spend the evening looking for 'foreigners' so they can kick the living daylights out of them for 'taking our homes, jobs, women etc'.


One thing I do know: I have no envy of anyone who works in the financial sector.


If someone wants to get up while it's still dark, put a cheap suit on, spend two hours a day on public transport with their nose pressed up against someone's armpit, spend ten hours reading the FT and looking at bar-charts whilst praying for 6pm to come - only to be press-ganged into awkward drinks with dick-swinging braying idiots they have nothing in common with other than where the payslips come from.. then more power to them.


It's not for me.

I have to say I actually enjoyed working in the financial sector and I like the city which really is a strange city within a city; good places to eat, some great pubs tucked around and about. I worked at a Dutch bank (soon not be any more but hey) and it had a pretty good culture that encouraged the idea that life's not all about work (you don't get that in the US banks) and trusted in personal responsibility.


You can usually avoid the braying idiots, especially by giving the Pitcher & Piano a very wide berth; that said my liver couldn't take the drink culture any more.


For the record I was an IT geek (gasps all round "Really?!?!?") so was never tempted by red braces over my pink stripey shirt with oversized white collars and cuffs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...