Jump to content

Recommended Posts

According to Ofsted its a 'good' school.


I have 2 kids there and I think its as good a state school as you are going to find in the area. There are some great teachers and it's a very nice community of parents & kids.


But it's oversubscribed. Where do you live?


Also they have an open day coming up in November I think, and the head does tours on Wednesday mornings sometimes, you have to book for those I think.

I would agree with mightyroar - its a good state school and I'm very pleased with our daughter's progress in reception. However, there are plenty of other good state primary schools in the area, which I'm sure plenty of other families would agree with. The best piece of advice, is to apply to your closest community primary school (if you aren't eligible for the faith schools), otherwise, you could end up with a place at a school not so conveniently located and perhaps not your preferred choice.

on maternity leave i visited all the local state schools. Heber stood out as being really good. The only issue i had was the pitiful sports area/play ground but actually compared to the other (state) schools this was normal. You have to go private to get decent sports facilities... :(


conclusion: heber's a sound school that i'd personally be happy to send my kids to

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...