Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Went and had a colour and cut at Willis B yesterday as a last treat before baby (due in two weeks). I decided to cover my outgrown highlights with an overall colour and on the advice of the colourist chose the one that was closest to my natural colour (dark brown) to avoid regrowth etc.


The new colour is very glossy and healthy looking but so very dark it is almost black. In no way is it close to my natural colour which is more chesnutty brown. In short I quite hate it!


What are my options do you think? Call Willis B and ask them to correct it (and pay all over again)? I realise that in the grand scheme of things this should not top my worry priority list...

Oh no, that's not what you need! I wonder if the colour will fade a bit over the first few washes? It might be that it only looks dark for a week or so and then will settle down a bit to a lighter colour. Worth ringing them to have a chat about it I think - if you're really not happy I'm sure they would re-do it either free or at a discounted price.
It will fade in just a week or two and should resemble your natural colour quite quickly. Did you have an Inoa colour? It might be worth the colourist describing the colouring process for you. They have done it for me but I am afraid I cannot remember the ins and outs of it to tell you here.

If you are up for it give them a ring or go in and tell them you are unhappy with the colour and it is not as discussed, i.e. it is not a good match for your natural colour and see what they say. Don't say much more than that, don't apologise or feel it is your fault for not liking it - it is not what you were expecting. After you have said your bit just be quiet and let them do the talking. See what they come up with and if it is acceptable to you. I think they should offer to do it for free and you certainly shouldn't tip again. I once read in a women's mag that a good salon should even give you back your original tip.


We spend bundles on our hair and should get what we want.


I complained once a million years ago funnily enough in Willis B when I had a severe crop, which I wanted at the time. When I got home, happy with the overall style I noticed that one side was above my ear and the other below - not deliberately. I went back to have it evened out and they were fine about it.


Practice what you are going to say but just don't say too much, stick to the facts and give them the opportunity to put it right. I am sure they would rather see a good post from you here tomorrow saying 'hey they were great and fixed it'. They want happy customers.


Good luck and with the pregnancy.

I did have the Inoa colour - wonder if that is any different to normal ammonia colourants? I may try to read up on it. I think the problem is last time I went there I had the top colourist and he seemed very capable and did exactly what I asked. This time I had the junior/first lever colourist who just put the colour as it was on my hair - that is she did not adjust it in any way.


I will give it till Monday and if I still hate it after a couple of washes etc I shall go back.

I agree with everyone that the colour will settle a bit and also you will get used to it. I did the same thing a few years ago and got rid of highlights that I had forever and was completely mortified coming out of the salon with what I considered to be black hair. My stylist did put a few lighter shades in front to not make it so dark but it still shocked me. I basically got used to it.


Also be careful with using lighter coloured towels when you wash your hair as sometimes the colour will transfer if it has recently been done. If you don't like it by Monday (as you say) then ask to have a few lighter strands done in the front to break up the dark colour. Good luck for the pregnancy/delivery.

I am addicted to having my hair coloured, every 6 weeks. If you have been before your colour should be on their records. Ring and explain the situation, maybe the mix was not correct. It is easy for them to get the mix ratio round the wrong way if they are very busy, it has nearly happened to me a few times. A good salon will not charge you to rectify it, they want to keep your custom, let them know. By the way i havent used this salon so my experiences are not with them.
I have cracked and called Willis B. Somone will hopefully call me back. At this point I dont really care if I have to pay again I just hate looking like Wednesday Adams. It's making me washed out, pale and more tired than I actually feel

I have heard that your hair is more absorbent or something when pregnant and that colour can take much more strongly than usual? Not sure if that's true, but a similar thing happened to me the last time I was pregnant and the golden highlights that are usually tinged with auburn came out bright orange! It was hideous.


I would get it fixed. Really, it should be at their cost. Maybe they could run some lighter highlights through especially around your face?

  • 2 weeks later...

They are a very good and very amenable salon I'm sure they will re do it for u for free but my suggestion would be to buy some head and shoulders and really wash ur hair alot it's makes colour fade alot and something we advise clients i'n the industry... Sadly this does happen alot with colour which is why i stick to cutting only....

A clients idea of what they want and the colour choice made don't always quite agree somewhere and redo's are a common thing i'n salons with colour, it's just one if those things sadly... Normally if u have colour history on ur hair it won't always come out the desired colour if not on virgin hair...

But if u go back I'm sure they will sort it for u they r good like that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...