Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Am hoping there may be someone out there that can answer this,

What is the rights of a consumer if

You bought something online via amazon

It was too big and poor quality

You miss the deadline for returning

You ask for a refund

They refuse

Amazon come down on the side of the seller

You now have

NO refund

NO item

Are you entitled to your item back?


I have just had the most comedy of conversations with A horrible customer service who apparently did a DNA test on a fancy dress costume worth ?50 to prove it had been worn more than once, apparently it's different DNA to that if you just try it on!!!


I don't know if anyone can help.

Thx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/138111-legal-question/
Share on other sites

Did you return it after their deadline? Do you have proof of posting? What was the problem with the item? Did you tell them? Perhaps a carefully worded letter might help. I suggest you contact Trading Standards for advice and help.


Statutory rights are not affected by return dates. So, if it's not fit for purpose they cannot say you didn't return it in time.


The return date is if you've changed your mind. It's a cooling off period and you can return in that timeframe if you change your mind.


Here's a couple of links.


https://www.amazon.co.uk/forum/deals?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1DEIHNWYF5SA9&cdThread=Tx3B6AA5Q8RHYE2


This one is more important;

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_gw_repol?nodeId=1161002


and it actually explains the confusion - they call Statutory Rights the same as Statutory Cancellation rights.


Statutory Rights are a consumer protection law if goods are not fit for purpose. the 'Stat Cancellation Rights" are different - just about changing your mind. It could be they have used them interchangeably in your case.

The second link has the important bit at the very bottom.


Other Statutory Rights


You have additional rights in relation to incorrect, damaged or defective goods. For more information about these statutory rights, please visit Adviceguide, a Citizens Advice website at: http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/. This link is provided to help our customers find out the rights they have where goods are not as described, not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.


If you need to contact us by post, please write to:


Amazon.co.uk Customer Services, 2-4 Waverley Gate, Waterloo Place, Edinburgh EH1 3EG

Thanks for the info, I think the issue is the item was a bit Naf anyway and possibly expectations were too high, my brother bought this and I'm trying to help him out, the seller basically has called him a thief and that he has committed fraud by wearing the garment several times and returning it which was not the case he just tried it on as any normal person would.

Apparently he is keeping the garment as proof and evidence if he has to prosecute with the DNA testing, it's ridiculous, it was a ?50 fancy dress costume. I've told him to go ahead and call the police.

My suspicions are that it's either been resold, binned or was damaged on purpose either way he's not in a position to send it back.

I'm sure there is something in the law that a transaction had been done so if a refund is refused whether rightly or wrongly you still have a right to the goods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...