Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Am hoping there may be someone out there that can answer this,

What is the rights of a consumer if

You bought something online via amazon

It was too big and poor quality

You miss the deadline for returning

You ask for a refund

They refuse

Amazon come down on the side of the seller

You now have

NO refund

NO item

Are you entitled to your item back?


I have just had the most comedy of conversations with A horrible customer service who apparently did a DNA test on a fancy dress costume worth ?50 to prove it had been worn more than once, apparently it's different DNA to that if you just try it on!!!


I don't know if anyone can help.

Thx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/138111-legal-question/
Share on other sites

Did you return it after their deadline? Do you have proof of posting? What was the problem with the item? Did you tell them? Perhaps a carefully worded letter might help. I suggest you contact Trading Standards for advice and help.


Statutory rights are not affected by return dates. So, if it's not fit for purpose they cannot say you didn't return it in time.


The return date is if you've changed your mind. It's a cooling off period and you can return in that timeframe if you change your mind.


Here's a couple of links.


https://www.amazon.co.uk/forum/deals?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1DEIHNWYF5SA9&cdThread=Tx3B6AA5Q8RHYE2


This one is more important;

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_gw_repol?nodeId=1161002


and it actually explains the confusion - they call Statutory Rights the same as Statutory Cancellation rights.


Statutory Rights are a consumer protection law if goods are not fit for purpose. the 'Stat Cancellation Rights" are different - just about changing your mind. It could be they have used them interchangeably in your case.

The second link has the important bit at the very bottom.


Other Statutory Rights


You have additional rights in relation to incorrect, damaged or defective goods. For more information about these statutory rights, please visit Adviceguide, a Citizens Advice website at: http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/. This link is provided to help our customers find out the rights they have where goods are not as described, not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.


If you need to contact us by post, please write to:


Amazon.co.uk Customer Services, 2-4 Waverley Gate, Waterloo Place, Edinburgh EH1 3EG

Thanks for the info, I think the issue is the item was a bit Naf anyway and possibly expectations were too high, my brother bought this and I'm trying to help him out, the seller basically has called him a thief and that he has committed fraud by wearing the garment several times and returning it which was not the case he just tried it on as any normal person would.

Apparently he is keeping the garment as proof and evidence if he has to prosecute with the DNA testing, it's ridiculous, it was a ?50 fancy dress costume. I've told him to go ahead and call the police.

My suspicions are that it's either been resold, binned or was damaged on purpose either way he's not in a position to send it back.

I'm sure there is something in the law that a transaction had been done so if a refund is refused whether rightly or wrongly you still have a right to the goods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...