Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Am hoping there may be someone out there that can answer this,

What is the rights of a consumer if

You bought something online via amazon

It was too big and poor quality

You miss the deadline for returning

You ask for a refund

They refuse

Amazon come down on the side of the seller

You now have

NO refund

NO item

Are you entitled to your item back?


I have just had the most comedy of conversations with A horrible customer service who apparently did a DNA test on a fancy dress costume worth ?50 to prove it had been worn more than once, apparently it's different DNA to that if you just try it on!!!


I don't know if anyone can help.

Thx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/138111-legal-question/
Share on other sites

Did you return it after their deadline? Do you have proof of posting? What was the problem with the item? Did you tell them? Perhaps a carefully worded letter might help. I suggest you contact Trading Standards for advice and help.


Statutory rights are not affected by return dates. So, if it's not fit for purpose they cannot say you didn't return it in time.


The return date is if you've changed your mind. It's a cooling off period and you can return in that timeframe if you change your mind.


Here's a couple of links.


https://www.amazon.co.uk/forum/deals?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1DEIHNWYF5SA9&cdThread=Tx3B6AA5Q8RHYE2


This one is more important;

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_gw_repol?nodeId=1161002


and it actually explains the confusion - they call Statutory Rights the same as Statutory Cancellation rights.


Statutory Rights are a consumer protection law if goods are not fit for purpose. the 'Stat Cancellation Rights" are different - just about changing your mind. It could be they have used them interchangeably in your case.

The second link has the important bit at the very bottom.


Other Statutory Rights


You have additional rights in relation to incorrect, damaged or defective goods. For more information about these statutory rights, please visit Adviceguide, a Citizens Advice website at: http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/. This link is provided to help our customers find out the rights they have where goods are not as described, not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.


If you need to contact us by post, please write to:


Amazon.co.uk Customer Services, 2-4 Waverley Gate, Waterloo Place, Edinburgh EH1 3EG

Thanks for the info, I think the issue is the item was a bit Naf anyway and possibly expectations were too high, my brother bought this and I'm trying to help him out, the seller basically has called him a thief and that he has committed fraud by wearing the garment several times and returning it which was not the case he just tried it on as any normal person would.

Apparently he is keeping the garment as proof and evidence if he has to prosecute with the DNA testing, it's ridiculous, it was a ?50 fancy dress costume. I've told him to go ahead and call the police.

My suspicions are that it's either been resold, binned or was damaged on purpose either way he's not in a position to send it back.

I'm sure there is something in the law that a transaction had been done so if a refund is refused whether rightly or wrongly you still have a right to the goods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sure - but to describe one councillor's hissy fit as a "fury" unrivalled by hell is a bit of an overstatement. Cllr Barber's attempt to hijack the moment by blaming austerity on Labour instead of the Lib Dem-Tory coalition is an amusing fumble too. It would have been better to keep quiet and enjoy the spectacle of Labour and ex-Labour councillors bickering. Labour is well-known for its ability to sustain internal catfights for years, if not decades!
    • Yes,  but as you said "at last" you had found a good reason not to vote for the greens, I wondered why you would want one. Plus it seemed (to me, at least) a very strange reason and didn't seem to have anything to do with the party's policies.
    • I also had a good experience with Andy, he was quick to respond and came out to resolve the issue at short notice. He was friendly and worked hard to find a solution to the problem with my tap which is now working like new again.
    • No, I clearly quoted you in my response; did you miss that? It’s obviously AI generated: any reasonable human being would be too ashamed to spin such arrant twadle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...