Jump to content

Biggest drop in income inequality in 30 years


????

Recommended Posts

An example of what is happening in East London came my way recently. An East European and his wife and baby got a 2 -bedroomed council flat. The husband went off to live with his builder mates and the wife then claimed benefits. She let the other bedroom to a working couple and she divided the sitting room with a curtain and let that to two working people. Meanwhile the husband visits regularly for conjugal reasons.....how long before she gets pregnant again and gets a 3 bedroomed council flat or house....we are being taken for a ride people and since there is not enough property to go round, the local councils will turn a blind eye like they did in the 1970s after we had an influx of refugees. Those refugees were living many to a house in poor areas, they more or less set up a parallel society and collected money together and bought property which they are now renting out room by room in our big cities- many to Europeans. I have personally seen examples of this in east London, and in Nottingham.

In Nottingham friend joked that when the night shift got home, they got into the bed of the day shift....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather than editing my post above yet again, and having now read the summary of the JRF report cited, it also acknowledges that their results show the opposite trend to other measures of relative poverty, based on %ages of median income. The authors' explanation is that those measures don't capture the true picture. Natch.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

unclegen, what has "East European" got to do with your post?


You do not provide any evidence that people from Eastern Europe are a net cost to the economy. I suggest that is because they are not.


Try this report: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit05.pdf from the LSE (hardly a hotbed of left-wing thought these days).


To quote from the summary:


"The big increase in EU immigration occurred after the ?A8? East European countries joined in 2004. In 2015 29% of EU immigrants were Polish. EU immigrants are more educated, younger, more likely to be in work and less likely to claim benefits than the UK-born. About 44% have some form of higher education compared with only 23% of the UK-born. About a third of EU immigrants live in London, compared with only 11% of the UK-born."


But you have chosen instead to mention "Eastern Europeans" in your post as naming a cost to us all. I think this is appalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> For example, the MIS for a lone parent with a baby, a toddler and a primary age

> child is apparently ?73,000/year, which seems a lot. It may be explained by the 'outgoings'

> including ?440/week for childcare.


That's pretty absurd. Curiously, throw a second adult into that household and they need less money to live on (?67,594) but they still need to spend ?440 a week on childcare.


Mind you, I stuck my details in (two person household, no kids, not pensioners) and the calculator seems to think we can survive on ?23,405 a year (after tax) between us. Whether or not that is reasonable depends on a whole host of factors, mainly around housing costs.


So, I think the figures are, at best, an interesting basis for a pub chat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the reports pretty clear about what it's measuring and provides a fair bit of narrative around it. The measure they're using for those 'at high risk of overty' is 75% if MIS (which of course one might still legitimately question). What's perhaps most interesting is their analysis for what is likely to happen to the incomes of those being described in the report over the next few years (a further, significant drop). Anyway, read the report, it's pretty nuanced https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/households-below-minimum-income-standard-200809-201415
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But you don't think the same protection should be afforded to those on the anti-LTN side...? Given the witch hunt some are be conducting to unearth which local residents are involved (see numerous examples on this forum), given the vandalism of the anti-LTN signs and interference with cars, labelling of anyone who opposes as some sort of petrol-head facist and given even Anna Goodman's tearing down of an anti-LTN poster you still think you only want anonimyity for those on one side of the argument? Does that not seem slightly hypocritical...it's why your first post on this issue entertained so many of us - it seemed ever so one-sided and summed up the challenges anyone who opposes the measures has to fight?
    • Hello again, Rubie, my cat, is still missing. He has been gone since 18th April.  Rubie is black and white, with black ears, a splendid white moustache, white front paws, and mostly white back legs.  Please check your sheds etc as he may be trapped, he’s a curious little thing.  I would really appreciate any help and suggestions. Thank you.
    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...