Jump to content

Banks - Lest We Forget


Jah Lush

Recommended Posts

SMG, I'm not denying that people have an uncanny knack of finding interesting solutions to problems.


And I think most if not all of those who know me, know that I have one of the sunniest dispositions known to man :)


But I'd venture to suggest that globalisation, added to global problems, have perhaps contributed significantly to something of a perfect storm, and that off-the-cuff talk of the inevitability of recovery - mentioned on this thread - sometime next-week-soon is really a little silly. Just because we rely on something happening doesn't mean it will; that's how children think.


Meantime, I'm doing things like installing big-time insulation (energy prices will only go up, yeah?) and doing other stuff that may be helpful or useful (as well as being fun, in many cases). Because I do think that BAU is over, for a while at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SMG, I'm not denying that people have an uncanny knack of finding interesting solutions to problems.


And I think most if not all of those who know me, know that I have one of the sunniest dispositions known to man :)


But I'd venture to suggest that off-the-cuff talk of the inevitability of recovery - mentioned on this thread - sometime next-week-soon is really a little silly. Just because we rely on something happening doesn't mean it will; that's how children think.


Meantime, I'm doing things like installing big-time insulation (energy prices will only go up, yeah?) and doing other stuff that may be helpful or useful (as well as being fun, in many cases). Because I do think that BAU is over, for a while at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SMG - Historically, every civilisation prior to

> ours has collapsed - often leaving barely a record

> of its demise: only the centuries of 'Dark Ages'

> that followed in their wake.


Tainter is worth reading on this issue.


>

> I agree with louisiana - the future for the

> so-called western economic system looks dire. The

> idea that it is somehow different this time sounds

> like wishful thinking, in my view.


Yes, special pleading, "this is different", "we are special" seems the incorrect approach, given the history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Just because we rely on something happening doesn't mean it will; that's how children think"


That's a bit harsh as a sweeping statement L. To be fair that's how 100% of us function day to day or we wouldnt step straight into our showers, get on a plane, make a phone call on an iPhone, actually scratch that last one.


But agreed critical thinking never hurt anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years ago I had an interest in a company that imported scientific instruments from India to Europe and the US - from optical laboratory microscopes to large-scale, computer-controlled biochemical and pharmaceutical manufacturing plants.


The idea that Asian countries are manufacturing low cost, low complexity, commodity crap is completely misinformed. Time after time we obtained complementary quotes from local manufacturers - they simply could not compete on price and quality ? their only advantage was proximity for servicing and training.


In time, as more Asian entrepreneurs arbitrage the price disparities, even those advantages are likely to evaporate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I can't resist, but the problem with Tainter is that he's come up with a clever idea and tries to get the facts to fit them, while losing sight of the sheer weight and body of evidence provided by boring sciences like, err, history and archaeology rather than anthropological complexity theory.


As a codicil to your axiom above I would say just because we want something to be true, doesn't make it so. Sadly that's exactly how far too many people think, children or no.


Edited 1 time(s). Last edit was today, 03:28pm by mockney piers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief - what a dismal bunch. Frankly, I think that while some will be worse off in the short term, this is just a blip. All the infrastructure for a decent economy is still in place, people are still buying goods and services and the sun will still come up tomorrow.


The UK is still in decent nick. Everyone - and I mean everyone - is better off than people were 30 years ago. Poverty is so unknown in this country they've had to redefine the word so the usual people have got something to wring their hands over. There are literally billions of people in over 100 countries that would swap places with the poorest person in the UK tomorrow.


For comparison, I was reading this article on the Beeb today about poverty 100 years ago back in 1910. Their food consisted of:


Monday:


* Breakfast - Tea, bread and margarine

* Dinner - Tea, bread and margarine

* Supper - Tea, bread


Tuesday:


* Breakfast -Tea, bread and jam

* Dinner - Tea, 3 stale buns

* Supper - Tea, bread


Sunday:


* Breakfast - Tea, kippers, bread

* Dinner - three pennyworth of meat pieces boiled with potatoes

* Tea - bread and margarine, onions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAL, "The idea that Asian countries are manufacturing low cost, low complexity, commodity crap is completely misinformed."


Sorry about this, I could have chosen my words more wisely than this cliche, what I was trying to do was talk about the products and services rolled out by a highly educated ingenious workforce, and those rolled out by grunt work.


Whilst there are sophisticated, educated elements in China, they're numbered at around 60m out of a population of 1.3bn. Identifying an exception to this will not disprove this argument - the uneducated majority is still the powerhouse of their economy, and a very precarious model it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is Brenda, but the point is that as more of the population becomes educated they become more socially demanding. This means an end to sweatshop labour policies and China becomes less competitive on the world stage. Threat diminished.


As the article Piersy discussed, the Chinese govt. is already turning a blind eye to labour disputes that would historically have been ruthlessly discouraged. They're supporting a wage inflation that narrows the wealth gap, but also undermines exports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I kind of get Huguenot's point, in that if there

> is a future in manufacturing in the UK, it is in

> niche/innovative/low-volume products... not vast

> quantities of low-cost consumer goods.


Tis true. Our wages demands don't support the manufacture of commodity items. We just cannot compete. We need to do the value-add, premium items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with that argument is that the BRICs already have high-tech manufacturing capabilities - in some areas their research and development facilities are equal to or more advanced than our own - or soon will be.


The western economies cannot be resurrected with low-volume, high-value components like satellites, for example, because they only employ relatively small groups of highly-skilled/qualified technicians and the demand is limited. And we still have to compete with our western peers.


What's left - luxury items like whiskey and wine are doing well right now but how long before Asian fakes flood those markets too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Hal:


Another Award winner likely to cause a surprise was an Indian Single Malt, which was awarded the title of World?s Third Best Whisky. Distilled in Bangalore, Amrut Fusion scored an outstanding 97 points. "It makes no matter where in the world a whisky is made. If it is magnificent, then it stands a chance of being recognized in the Whisky Bible Awards. Amrut have been bottling astonishing whisky for a few years now. But this particular bottling just made my hairs stand on end. It is hard to find a whisky with better balance. India has unquestionably arrived as a whisky nation? added Murray.



PS - if manufacturing isn't the answer, can't we go back to providing our own food? [i don't like bananas that much.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...