Jump to content

So seriously, does anyone still think that Corbyn is a good opposition leader? Really?


Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Has he?

>

> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sadi

> q-khan-accused-of-breaking-election-promise-to-fre

> eze-london-transport-fares-a7070496.html



Yep, he promised Tfl fares would be frozen for four years and they have been. He never promised that DfT fares would be frozen, as he can't. I refer the honorable gentleman to Mr.Khan's mayoral manifesto (direct quote): "I will freeze all TfL fares and charges for the Mayor?s cycle hire scheme for four years." That's what he promised, that's what he's done. Those who point at the DfT fares, over which he has no control, going up are accusing him of reneging on a pledge he never made.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> As for SK, didn't he propose JC in the first

> place?


He did, but only in the same way as others did, in their "broaden the debate" initiative (admittedly it looks like a bloody silly thing to have done now). SK didn't vote for Corbyn in the leadership election.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trouble is people like us (certainly me) did not

> get the government of our choice (I'd have been

> revealed if we'd had more of the same,

> irrespective that I didn't vote for either of them

> and Lib Dem traitors).


Hmmm. Dontcha just wish them Lib Dem 'traitors' were still holding the balance of power? We wouldn't be in this Brexit mess, for a start.

  • 2 weeks later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You Gov have published their approval ratings.

> Jezza is now polling negative in:

>

> Every Demographic - class, age, gender

> Every Region

>

> AND

>

> among Labour voters

>

> That's absolutely unprecedented



I've been trying to find a link to the results- do you have one by any chance?

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You Gov have published their approval ratings.

> > Jezza is now polling negative in:

> >

> > Every Demographic - class, age, gender

> > Every Region

> >

> > AND

> >

> > among Labour voters

> >

> > That's absolutely unprecedented

>

>

> I've been trying to find a link to the results- do

> you have one by any chance?


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jeremy-corbyns-approval-rating-slides-into-net-negative-for-every-demographic_uk_589d9c95e4b094a129ea0a87

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You Gov have published their approval ratings.

> Jezza is now polling negative in:

>

> Every Demographic - class, age, gender

> Every Region

>

> AND

>

> among Labour voters

>

> That's absolutely unprecedented


"Anthony Wells, Research Director at YouGov told The Huffington Post UK: ?In short, looking at any measure of polling Jeremy Corbyn is doing badly as Labour leader, but it?s by no means unprecedented.... Gordon Brown and Nick Clegg were both perceived far more negatively than Corbyn.""


I want him to go but let's keep it real.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ???? Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > You Gov have published their approval

> ratings.

> > > Jezza is now polling negative in:

> > >

> > > Every Demographic - class, age, gender

> > > Every Region

> > >

> > > AND

> > >

> > > among Labour voters

> > >

> > > That's absolutely unprecedented

> >

> >

> > I've been trying to find a link to the results-

> do

> > you have one by any chance?

>

> http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jeremy-corby

> ns-approval-rating-slides-into-net-negative-for-ev

> ery-demographic_uk_589d9c95e4b094a129ea0a87




Thanks

Genuine question, would Clive Lewis be a good leader? He seems to tick a lot of boxes - particularly having served in Afghanistan, which would really confuse the Daily Mail when they tried to attack him as unpatriotic.

"He's a disaster, but who would people like to see succeed him? If there was an obvious, strong, alternative candidate he'd have been replaced already."


I think the view of the majority of the PLP is that any alternative candidate would be likely to do a better job than Corbyn, but he hasn't been replaced because the current membership of the Party at large support him. The selection of someone like Clive Lewis, a self-proclaimed "unashamed socialist" but without the baggage of someone like J McDonnell or D Abbott, would at least allow Labour to have a go at being a real left wing party but with a competent leader. I still don't think they would have a prayer of winning a GE but likely to be a lot better at being an effective opposition.

I suspect a lot of the PLP have decided to just try to hang one and let brexit move on a bit.


If Lewis took over now he'd be slaughtered for voting against article 50 (not by me, but I don't matter).

So, all the Labour MPs who defied Corbyn are now going to be given a written warning. And not just any old written warning... a *formal* written warning.


I bet they are trembling in their boots. That'll learn them.

It looks increasingly likely they will lose Stoke to UKIP. Very incisive on the ground report in the FT today - their campaign in total disarray. FT thinks they might even lose the other one to the Tories.


Time for the reasonable ones to rally round Clarke and form a centre party. The days of the dual-party system are coming to a rapid end.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...