Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> STOP PARKING WHERE YOU SHOULDN'T AND YOU WON'T GET

> A TICKET YOU UNFUNNY TEDIOUS @#$%&.

---------------------------------------------------------


Simple, really ?


No, I ran a shopfitting business that predominately operated in the West End


I employed 14 people full time & may other contractors


Hand on heart I can say that Traffic wardens "Predated" on us, to such a point it eventually became violent & out of hand


I paid on average about ?600 + per month on tickets for parking "Violations" like tyres over lines or bumpers over bays and of course I fought them all, but the admin killed me


So eventually after a massive police VS parking warden blow up & for the stress alone, I dissolved the company


Sadly, the revenue generated by the borough is more important than the business operating within it



I have no tolerance for them, in fact I dispise the tactics they employ ( & many are illegal )


Bring back the " move on please " GENUINE police force controlled "traffic warden" & the rest can rot in hell



W**F

She won*t have it woof, 'they' never do...I was just about willing to pay the 6 mins in a 5 mins zone whilst picking up my kid from nursery as after all technically that's right but the 3 totally illegal ones I've not paid I've had to face their brinkmanship and ever increasing legal threats and rely on inde[endent witnesses who said they'd back me in court in 2 cases and documented proof in the other.....I don't get any compensation for being threatened with baliffs and the time I have to take to right back...but according to Rosie et al we're all just Jeremy Clarksons. They are bandits and deserve all the crap they get IMO as they reap it on themselves with their banditry

Oooh - The strength of the drink on ryanair these days...


The only time i have ever succeeded in an appeal against these people was in a bus lane outside Kings when dropping lovely wife off in "l"abour and I still had to write 3 letters to avoid the charge. Had to then provide birth certificate of child born later that day before fine was dropped.


In the end think Rosie is just about right - if you mess up you pay. Unless you have a VERY good excuse.

6 parking tickets in 30 years all in the past 6 years, 4 illegal....mmmm. I've no problem with paying a fine if you break the parking law )and both of mine were mine that were legal were just minutes over the limit but that's the law - just has to work both ways. Stop sucking up to Rosie.

I got a parking ticket last year in Camden on a Sunday afternoon, found a space in a set of bays, had a good look around and found there was no 'pay and display' sign or meter to be seen, just one restriciting loading on the yellow line next to the bays mon-fri. The bays across the road had a pay and display sign which I thought a little odd but left it, came back to a parking fine so I took photos of the lack of signs, etc.

Appealed the parking fine and they sent me a photo of the 'pay and display' sign they claimed was there, using streetview I matched the sign in the photo to one further down the road on the opposite side of the road. No matter appeal rejected, so I paid up, wasn't happy about it though.


A week later I was going past the same spot so I deicded to get out to have another look, and there was a brand new 'pay and display' sign on a pole in front of the bays I parked in, with the concrete still wet. Now that's taking the p*ss, rejecting my appeal by saying there was adequate sinage then putting up a new sign after the fact. I later found out that it is common pratice to reject the first appeal automatically as most people will give up then.


Sure if you're in the wrong fair enough, but some of their tactics are pretty low.

Well, I think it's hilarious.


Can the next one be about misunderstandings with South Asian bus conductors? That'll give me a hearty laugh.


If we could have something about Muslims struggling to eat through their burka, that'll make me weep with laughter.


What about some hysterically funny stuff about trying to order from Chinese restaurants?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

but

> according to Rosie et al we're all just Jeremy

> Clarksons.


No, numbnuts, Harry and Paul are Clarkson in disguise. You're, like, way hotter than Clarkson and you wear altogether better jeans ;-)


My point is about the hysterical "they're all out to get us" mentality that the Parking Patewayo sketches espouse. I expected something a bit more intelligent and a little less Daily Mail from Paul Whitehouse is all.


Parking wardens who target you illegally? B@stards. Parking wardens who target you absolutely legally? Suck it up.

Kiwi, the first appeal always gets rejected, that's standard. You have to continue to contest it, and eventually you'll get a hearing scheduled in some sort of mickey-mouse court. If you have hard evidence then you'll win - although I gather that by the time you get to this stage, the council often give up and you win by default.


Unforuntately illegal/unscrupulous/predatory traffic wardens are a reality!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...