Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Day


Oh yes, you're nearly over but you haven't broken me ( NO )


My work was harder than necessary , my tyre popped at full speed in the outside lane of the motorway & I limped into a dark country lane on the A20


You did the same to me 2 days ago, so my spare was "in use" already & you thought you "had me" 30 miles from home


My children were stuck in deepest darkest Kent but a good friend lent me his spare & another drove it down


Boys now collected & in bed & I'm happy



So, try harder next time, we " the friends indeed " are out to thwart you


Tomorrow I'll fight you again



So, how was yours ?



W**F

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/14027-dear-day/
Share on other sites

OK...



So my starter motor went in Sainsbo's car park...


( complete stranger gave me a bump start, so the world's not a bad place )


Pure coincidence of course


They ( who ever "they" are ) say things come in 3's


So here's to a great weekend



* touches wood , buys lucky heather from old gypsy woman *




W**F

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/14027-dear-day/#findComment-377155
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
    • Isabelle Capitain on 7 Upland Road will be able to do that for you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...