Jump to content

A general thread to discuss Trump

intexasatthe moment

By intexasatthe moment
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

snowy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tell me who just said this Keane:

>

> "There's no question - none - that President Trump

> is practically and morally responsible for

> provoking the events of the day."


I think it was Mitch McConnell, leader of the senate Republicans.

He (said he) voted not guilty because he thinks Trump shouldn?t have been impeached in the first place.



Keano: ?Perhaps Nancy and her gang should now consider resigning??

Like you do when you?ve set-up a trial that found Trump 57-Guilty and 43-Not Guilty of inciting insurrection.

The record stands, Trump is Guilty.

Just the 2/3 required majority, which was not met, means he?s acquitted.

Republicans scared to vote against Trump, immediately after the vote Don Jr announces we?re coming to get those 7 senators. Demonstrating the fear being justified. Disgusting.

TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

Perhaps this isn't the thread for it...but this whole sorry affair highlights extreme partisan nature of US politics (echoed in the UK of course along both party and brexit lines more recently)...does the Republican party have a future in its current form? Which also raises the question on the democrats as well...which also raises the broader question of party politics in places like the UK, where both major parties are plagued by factionalism within their respective parties.


It's seems in our modern world, when narrow interest groups (at all ends of the political spectrum) often make the most noise, there is little room for 'moderates' with broad appeal when it comes to almost any issue....


(As I say, perhaps off topic a bit, but I can't be bothered starting a new thread right now!)

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

All valid and pertinent points, Cat.

Interesting how some Rep senators, pre-election, repeatedly branded the Dems ?far left, extreme left, left wing radicals?. When actually the Dems are Right wing, if anything.

They just are not extreme like some of the Rep senators.

It?d take some doing to be further right than the Reps now !

JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now Melania can divorce him


Or maybe she'll just avoid his hand when he tries to hold it as she usually does.


I suspect this will come back to bite the republicans at some stage.

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Now Melania can divorce him

>

> Or maybe she'll just avoid his hand when he tries

> to hold it as she usually does.

>

> I suspect this will come back to bite the

> republicans at some stage.


What - the divorce ?!

JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Seabag Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Now Melania can divorce him

> >

> > Or maybe she'll just avoid his hand when he

> tries

> > to hold it as she usually does.

> >

> > I suspect this will come back to bite the

> > republicans at some stage.

>

> What - the divorce ?!


No just the whole thing of allowing Trump to get a way with it.


I still think she'll stay with him ... even if she's unhappy (and she must be how could anyone be happy living with him). which is sad.

wordsworth

wordsworth

Posted
Posted

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well I guess no-one put a gun to her head when she

> chose to marry him (I'm speculating there..!).

> But imagine actually choosing to breed with him,

> the mind boggles.



Yeah, all that wee everywhere...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • TWB Cat Sitter
      Missing Cat

      By TWB Cat Sitter · Posted

      Is Gigi spayed & microchipped?
    • Sue
      Up date on Viet Flavour

      By Sue · Posted

      😮
    • NewWave
      Up date on Viet Flavour

      By NewWave · Posted

      was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • kiera
      GALA 2026

      By kiera · Posted

      Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...