Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anna Soubry, suggesting that many MPs are afraid to speak out against Brexit:


?People are not prepared, with a few exceptions, to put their head above the parapet, for fear they will be shot down by the four newspapers that appear to be running the country,? she said, referring to the Sun, Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph and the Daily Express. ?People have gone to ground. Where?s the voice of business??


Read this in the FT and thought it was spot on. Despite half the country voting to remain, there seems to be very little opposition to May's apparent course of 'hard brexit'.

Newspapers only print what their readership will pay to read. They aren't running the country, they are running a business where the more people view what they write the more money they make. If they write stuff people don't want to read they quickly go bust.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Newspapers only print what their readership will

> pay to read. They aren't running the country, they

> are running a business where the more people view

> what they write the more money they make. If they

> write stuff people don't want to read they quickly

> go bust.



That's not strictly accurate. Newspapers have a very loyal readership. People will read the express or mail their whole lives and their kids will carry on the tradition. Then, what's written influences those readers as they won't stop buying the paper unless what their used to suddenly changes wildly.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Newspapers only print what their readership will

> pay to read.


I can read the Mail, Telegraph and Express online for nothing. I don't agree with their politics but I will look to see what they're saying, you have to in order to counter their arguments.


> They aren't running the country, they

> are running a business where the more people view

> what they write the more money they make.


That doesn't mean they don't exert a strong political influence though. Blair wasted no time in cosying up to Murdoch because it suited him politically.



> If they write stuff people don't want to read they quickly go bust.


Agree, but it's mainly the non-political clickbait that pays the bills...

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...