Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I walk that way quite often .. Ganapatti advertise

> a Lunch time (12.00 - 14.30) selection of meals

> for ?7.50 ish

> I have looked in with the intention of giving

> them another bash. But! the place appears to be

> closed. All in darkness at those times.

>

> The T/A seems to be non-functional with a

> Motor-bike parked inside and a large Trellis table

> with odd jars

> of spices and pans. No sign of life. There

> appears to be no counter / Hatch.

>

> Can't work it out.

>

> Foxy


It's closed all day Mondays, maybe your walks coincide with that.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I walk that way quite often .. Ganapatti

> advertise

> > a Lunch time (12.00 - 14.30) selection of

> meals

> > for ?7.50 ish

> > I have looked in with the intention of giving

> > them another bash. But! the place appears to be

> > closed. All in darkness at those times.

> >

> > The T/A seems to be non-functional with a

> > Motor-bike parked inside and a large Trellis

> table

> > with odd jars

> > of spices and pans. No sign of life. There

> > appears to be no counter / Hatch.

> >

> > Can't work it out.

> >

> > Foxy

>

> It's closed all day Mondays, maybe your walks

> coincide with that.


Yes , I know that. Thanks.. There has been a lot of roadworks outside which I thought may be why they were closed.

or looked closed. In darkness and no sign of life inside..


DulwichFox

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What Willard said.

> Whole thing's a sham.


I'm with the Kid and Willard.


I can't think of anything less romantic than making an extra effort to show your love for someone on the same day as everyone else.


And having to pay more for the privilege.

My dwarf girlfriend went to work this morning really upset with me because I've been teasing her about her size. So for valentines night I'm cooking her a delicious meal and having a lovely bottle of wine, watch her favourite dvd box set then go upstairs and run her a nice hot sink.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...