Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You really need to be more alert AdminMan/Woman....... What about the Telegraph Hill post by "Jeremyweate" on the 2nd Nov.... Come on now tut tut tut. One rule for some & all that. I suggest you ditch the awful sarcasm your posts generally adopt & you spend a good 10 minutes traipsing through the residential section for any sidewinders, aliens & interlopers. Come on AdminMan/Woman you can do it.... The Good Folk of East Dulwich are depending on you.

Is it a bird? Is it a plane?...... No, it's AdminMan/Woman.:)-D

Yes, Huguenot... that naughty Adminman/woman wrote me a really horrible sarcastic response.... but completely ignored the fact that posts that were sitting right next to mine advertising properties outside of ED were somehow getting the old green light from him/her.

I'm just reacting to the Admistrator's blind eye approach to some & Thought Police approach to others.

Very Kafka-esque if you ask me.

Is this a new order because people have been advertising rooms, houses, etc. in Nunhead, Peckham and Camberwell for ages. Does that mean the Bellenden/Dog Kennel Hill (SE15 and SE5) area is also off limits? And what about Honor Oak Park etc. Is there some sort of map you could refer to Admin?
  • Administrator

No, it's the same as it has always been.


Edited to add: If you imagine East Dulwich on a map, that's the area that the Residential Property in East Dulwich section covers. It's not a clearly defined line, it's a rough line with a bit of give and take.

Hi Cate,


I couldn't understand it myself. A friend pointed me toward EDF & sure enough there were lots of people looking for accomodation in & around ED. I saw that other posts were from Herne Hill, Sydenham, Peckham, Nunhead, Dulwich Village & Crystal Palace were there so didn't give it a second thought. I was getting good responses but then my post would just dissapear. 3 times it vanished with no polite reason given. I finally emailed admin & got back a terse reply & that I should use the Nunhead Forum. I have reacted by asking him about the other "alien" posts. I am now wondering if it has anything to do with Daisylets who just happen to be a sponsor of this site. The daft thing is my property is on with them, Foxtons & Ludlow Thompson. As I've not had much movement on my property I thought I'd give the EDF a go. So there you have it. I've had my wrists slapped along with a handful of terse & sarcastic emails. I will be uploading these emails for all to see very soon. Why have the creators of this site got so precious about postings or is this particular admin person got an overbloated opinion of themselves.


Regards, Gary

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, it's the same as it has always been.



Don't think it was ever clearly defined before. Some people living in East Dulwich SE22 can't afford to stay here (rent or buy) so naturally look for something nearby.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Admin, what is East Dulwich to you?

>

> It's the time, it's the place, it's is the motion.

> East Dulwich is the way we are feeling.


Eh? Can you be a bit more specific.....

  • Administrator

OK, look, the forum property section is entitled "Residential property in East Dulwich".

Now Nunhead is not East Dulwich, so a property in Nunhead does not belong in there.

I am not going to allow property from Nunhead, New Cross or Greenwich in that section.


I have no idea what people not being able to afford to live in East Dulwich SE22 has to do with the boundaries.


Gary, you're just being insulting now. You are complaining that a free resource will not let you use their services for free.

He/She is a bit lame this admin person. He's obviously only responding to ads that get flagged up by other users. I'm wondering just who flagged mine up? This could be the death of EDF.... Nothing worse than an admin person who is doing dodgy under the table deals. Wake up Adminman/woman. What the hell was that daft response to "Cate"? Are you propped up at the bar in the EDT with your laptop?

God has spoken... You really have let this admin role go to your head.

How have I been insulting? Where do you get your boundaries from?

You certainly can't be selective either.

You can't just pluck them out of mid-air & move the goal posts.

You really do have a very high opinion of yourself.

Must be a damn lonely place to be you.

Is that what this is really all about? You really hate this role don't you?

You are like Frankenstein's creator... you can't look in the mirror can you?


You say in a previous post to Cate, that you will not let people post properties on EDF if they

are in Nunhead, Greenwich or New Cross.

Fair enough, Greenwich & New Cross come under the borough of Lewisham, but Nunhead is actually in Southwark which is just

the other side of Peckham Rye Common.


It is very obvious that as far as the the residential forum is concerned that people are looking for more affordable

means of housing other than ED.


I believe you know you are wrong but can't afford to lose face at this point of proceedings.

hadenuff Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is that what this is really all about? You really

> hate this role don't you?

> You are like Frankenstein's creator... you can't

> look in the mirror can you?

>

> You say in a previous post to Cate, that you will

> not let people post properties on EDF if they

> are in Nunhead, Greenwich or New Cross.

> Fair enough, Greenwich & New Cross come under the

> borough of Lewisham, but Nunhead is actually in

> Southwark which is just

> the other side of Peckham Rye Common.

>

> It is very obvious that as far as the the

> residential forum is concerned that people are

> looking for more affordable

> means of housing other than ED.

>

> I believe you know you are wrong but can't afford

> to lose face at this point of proceedings.


--------------------------------------------------


Oooh, i love a good rant,

but i think i've..

had enough!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...