Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am hoping to have a home birth and have my 'birth pool in a box' ready but I have become very paranoid about the weight of it once filled with water.


We live in a top floor flat of a converted Victorian house and although it seems in good condition, I am concerned about the joists etc being able to take the weight of the pool.


We contacted the surveyor we used when purchasing our flat who thinks it should be ok but he would charge us ?140 to actually come out and have a look which is alot.


I just wondered if anyone lives in a similar type of property and used a pool, or has anyone actually ever heard of someone plummeting mid labour down into their neighbours below!


Thanks

I remember my midwife said something sensible to me on this matter. She said that a full pool is about the weight of 20 people. Would you be worried about your ceiling/floor if you had a party with 20 people all standing next to each other? Most ceilings should be able to deal with it. Good luck with your birth.

I think I read somewhere that it is better to put it to the side of the room, rather than in the middle, but am I making that up? I know they midwives need good access so can't be too tucked away of course.


Good luck - had my 2nd in a birth pool at home and it was lovely. xxx

We're in the top part of a Victorian house, had my little girl 3 weeks ago at home in the pool + 5 people with no probs at all.


We were paranoid too, esp as our house is not in the greatest nick, but all was lovely!


I've never heard of a pool dropping through a ceiling but completely understand your worry!

Thanks for the comments, feel more reassured.

I too had heard the corner of the room is better, access for midwives allowing and that the weight is equal to about 10average sized adults which we have had in our flat many times.


Hopefully if I do plummet through the floors I will survive to have a funny birth story!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...