Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My daughter (nearly 6) has been doing swimming lessons in Beckenham for nearly a year. She loves them but there's not been a great deal of progress - she still can't really 'swim' for more than a couple of seconds! I'm thinking of trying to switch to lessons at Dulwich Pool in the New Year but my daughter is very worried about being, literally, out of her depth at the new pool as it's not as shallow as Beckenham kids' pool. Whereas I feel it might help her to make quicker progress if she can't be tempted to put her feet down all the time.


Has anyone had experience of the beginners' classes there? Obviously I know they won't leave them to drown but does anyone know how they make the transition from using a float to swimming sole when they can't touch the bottom? And any thought of what level class she should join? She can go nearly a whole width using a float or noodle (front and back) but she can only do a couple of strokes on her own without sinking. I'm thinking level 2 or 3 but not sure... Any feedback much appreciated.

redjam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My daughter (nearly 6) has been doing swimming

> lessons in Beckenham for nearly a year. She loves

> them but there's not been a great deal of progress

> - she still can't really 'swim' for more than a

> couple of seconds! I'm thinking of trying to

> switch to lessons at Dulwich Pool in the New Year

> but my daughter is very worried about being,

> literally, out of her depth at the new pool as

> it's not as shallow as Beckenham kids' pool.

> Whereas I feel it might help her to make quicker

> progress if she can't be tempted to put her feet

> down all the time.

>

> Has anyone had experience of the beginners'

> classes there? Obviously I know they won't leave

> them to drown but does anyone know how they make

> the transition from using a float to swimming sole

> when they can't touch the bottom? And any thought

> of what level class she should join? She can go

> nearly a whole width using a float or noodle

> (front and back) but she can only do a couple of

> strokes on her own without sinking. I'm thinking

> level 2 or 3 but not sure... Any feedback much

> appreciated.



I would recommend Superkids swimschool at Thomas the Apostle in Nunhead.


Superkids Swimming School

Tel: 020 8651 2002

Speak to Joe or Margaret

My 5 year old is currently doing beginners/level 1 at Dulwich pool.

I think we've done 5/10 sessions so far, and the children have mostly been

'swimming' half widths, front and back, using floats.

Last week the tutor took each child back and forth without floats, by holding

onto their fingertips and asking them to kick, then for a few seconds she let them

try alone, the results were a bit mixed! Anyway, I'm not sure how it will progress, and if

any of them will be swimming a few stokes alone by the end of the 10 weeks, but I'll keep you

posted.

My not so tall 5 year old can just about touch the bottom of the pool on tiptoes, which seems

ideal, he's worked out that he's safe, but keeps on kicking/moving just in case!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...