Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hear that is KFH going into that site.

I'm quite excited as I am looking to sell my place soon and I dont actually rate any of the others.

I have family who have used them before and their approach is far superior to anyone else I;ve heard of. They wouldn't consider any other agent over Kinleigh Folkhard & Hayward

A breathe of fresh air.


We all need to sell sometime, so their help is appreciated in my opinion

the branches they have in peckham and dulwich village do not attract buyers looking in and around Lordship Lane. Anyone who has sold or is trying to sell in SE22 can surely see that a local agent is more beneficial. My relatives do not live in the area so have no need to participate in opinion sharing on this local forum.

munki Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the branches they have in peckham and dulwich

> village do not attract buyers looking in and

> around Lordship Lane.


Not necessarily. I bought my house from KFH in Peckham (and I live just off LL). Also, when I let my house a few years ago, I advertised through Wates (LL branch), but actually snared the tenant through the Dulwich Village branch.

And they all advertise on the property websites anyway which is going to be most buyers first port of call. If looking to buy then you can do it all over the phone and internet except when it comes to viewing the property. And in lots of cases the owners show it, not the agents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...