Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I could be wrong (ususally am) but I thought the names on the vandalised and dismantled monument were transferred to the new one by the southern gates.


I certainly think the original area should be preserved and honoured appropriately, but unless you disinter the bodies and go for full dna process (a la Prince Philip and Romanovs) I don't see how you will identify the unmarked graves. My opinion is that it's not appropriate to do this - let them rest in peace literally.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I could be wrong (ususally am) but I thought the

> names on the vandalised and dismantled monument

> were transferred to the new one by the southern

> gates.

>

> I certainly think the original area should be

> preserved and honoured appropriately, but unless

> you disinter the bodies and go for full dna

> process (a la Prince Philip and Romanovs) I don't

> see how you will identify the unmarked graves. My

> opinion is that it's not appropriate to do this -

> let them rest in peace literally.


Ah I see what you mean, and yes I agree. Sorry to Eddie but I doubt that the cemetery friends will be able to help with this as I suggested above :-$

Edanlay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am trying to trace the relatives of men buried

> in unmarked War graves in Nunhead Cemetery as I am

> trying to get the War Graves Commission to do

> something about this matter.Eddie.


When you say do something about it what do you actually mean?

I thank you for your interest but I am not after such drastic measures as you suggest.The graves are noted in cemetery records as are those interred in them. There whereabouts are known and those that are marked by headstones have been neglected and their names are on the memorial as well which they should not be as the War Graves Commission are responsible for and should have maintained them. When I referr to unmarked graves we know where they are and think they should be marked with headstones as they all are abroad. The War Graves Commission themselves admit that soldiers buried in this country do not have the same treatment as those that died abroad. I want to change this.
I would like to headstones placed on the graves of men buried in plot 89 which total 270 men. At the very least a memorial to those men on that plot. Also a Cross of Scrifice which is normal for a cemetery with at least 40 men buried there. Nunhead has 690 but has no Cross, it was removed by the War Graves Commission. The reason I am looking for relatives is that they can request headstones for their lost family members.
The graves of these men are in cemetery records and where and who is recorded. All I want the names of relatives for is that they can request headstones from the War Graves Commission. There are 270 men buried in plot 89 with no headstones and no memorials on that site. I would like a Cross of Sacrifice erected at least to replace the one they removed. There would be no need to disturb any graves to do this.

From the CWGC Debt of Honour Section....


Nunhead (All Saints) Cemetery contains 580 Commonwealth burials of the 1914-1918 war. The majority are in three war graves plots; the United Kingdom plot (in Square 89) has 260 graves, the Australian plot (near the main entrance) has 23 and the Canadian plot (in Square 52, also containing New Zealand and South African burials) has 36. The graves in the Australian and Canadian plots are marked with individual headstones. The graves in the United Kingdom plot and the remaining war graves scattered throughout the cemetery could not be marked individually; the casualties buried in these graves are therefore commemorated by name on a Screen Wall inside the main entrance gate to the cemetery. A second Screen Wall commemorates the 110 burials of the 1939-1945 war in a further war graves plot in Square 5 and elsewhere in the cemetery whose graves could not be marked by headstones. There is also 1 Belgian burial of the 1914-1918 war and 7 Non-war Service burials commemorated here.

No. of Identified Casualties: 698


I think you might be trying to push water uphill here, but good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Did the current owner choose to do this or have they 'inherited' it? If they chose to do this then they're obviously not wedded to original period features so I'd go with an infill of matching floorboards, perhaps stain the whole lot and stagger joints so they blend in better.  If they inherited this and want a period feature I'd go with decorative Victorian tiles (I don't like the sound of self-adhesive vinyl tiles). Then use it to place a floor lamp/house plants/candles etc to make it look like it was meant to be rather than a cover-up job.  Both options will require some chipping away of the concrete to provide a level finish with the floorboards, but much preferable than a trip hazard step and something that looks bodged.  After chipping away at the concrete I'd use a self-leveling screed to provide a flat surface to work with.  Other options are a rug, piece of furniture etc and let someone else have the problem!...
    • PECKHAM PODCAST talks with Charlotte Prendergast about under-achieving Black boys in local schools. Charlotte runs Southside Young Leaders Academy (SYLA) based in Peckham and presents a positive story of intervention and support.
    • There is a free one in the for sale section.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...