Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We live just under 1km from Charter Red Post Hill (970 metres according the Google Maps).


The Website says the furthest ever offered is 2000 metres, so although we are within that, it doesn't tell me any more. According to Rightmove we are in the admissions area (although I don't know where that information comes from). I know families on our road and at least one road further away do have children at the school, but of course I don't know any more about their circumstances on admission (if it was based on distance, or on other factors).


Is anyone able to share any info on typical distance from the school.


(and this is no relation to the other thread on 'renters row'... we've been in our house for a long long time!!)


Thank you

AFAIK this kind of information is not published publicly. You should try to contact the school and ask them directly; if you do, it would be interesting if you could post the answer here.


To be honest I have no idea if the school is obliged to share this information, or can refuse to do so when asked explicitly.


PS I'd imagine the new Charter on ED will relieve some pressure off its North Dulwich 'sister' school.

If you ring or email the admissions team there they will tell you the furthest distance offered. Someone did this last year and posted it in one of the discussions about secondary admissions. I can't find the post now, but from memory it was 1,050m. That, I think, was "safe walking route". I believe that this year they are switching to "as the crow flies" distance. You're best to ring and ask them, but I'd leave it until September if you want this year's distance as I think you still get a lot of movement all through the summer holidays, right up to the start of term.

Thanks - I'm looking for Sep 2018, and yes the Admissions Policy for 2018 is now as crow flies, and no longer safest walking distance. Which makes us closer than the distance I'd mentioned above, although would also make lots of addresses closer I guess?


Will call them and see if they can say for Sep 2017 entry, once that is all finalised.

Just to say Charter, Red Post Hill's policy for admissions seems to have changed for 2018. If you look on their website they have five admission points. Point iv (five) which is the last admission criteria, is for students living nearest to the school.


So if you live near to the school you might have a chance.


Point v (four) is for the admission of children of teachers at the school.

"it's normal for children of staff to be given priority. And it makes sense."


I'd never heard of it in the state sector. Had a google and found quite an interesting thread on Mumsnet on the subject: https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/secondary/2321161-Children-of-staff-admission-priority?reverse=1

Policy makes sense to me, especially when there are teacher shortages for secondary. Whilst a teacher's children are at primary school they will be in a after-school club, but there is no such thing for secondary. Having your 11 year old at the school where you teach may be the deciding factor on whether you are able to keep your job (since child can come to your classroom after school and so not be home alone until 6pm).
I'm 100% in favour of children of teachers having a priority. If we want our local schools to have good teachers we need to give them every possible incentive to keep teaching in SE22 once they have a family (when, chances are, they have to live somewhere quite a distance away that is more affordable).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
    • That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’.        Brexit happened Sue.  Boring graphs!  Calling Nigel Farage a plastic patriot is also very insulting seeing as he and the Reform Party have had a landslide victory all over England.
    • These charity collectors are often classed as chuggers.  It can be scandalous that the charity/admin may keep a huge percentage of your donations and a tiny percentage is  actually given to the charity.   I can not speak for individual collectors - but it common practice.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...