Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's like Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse with those two.


Perhaps they were young and funny once but these days are living off past glories and are embarrassing themselves like some bedwetting relative you'd rather you didn't have over at Xmas. You try and ignore them but the stench becomes too much.

EDF sure is a steep learning curve!


I had never acknowledged RosieH in any way yet she chooses to involve herself in comments that I have made.


Not content with that she initiates abuse and derogatory terminology.


After a succession of abusive comments from the delighful RosieH I then reciprocate, so RosieH becomes the "young" silent innocent "victim" and I get told to shut up and are abused by others including the cravated Dandy himself David Carnell Esquire!


What a jolly caper with the added bonus of sniping from the periphery of the Inner Circle. LOL


What a charming exclusive little Club this is. lol

I am getting fit. I am trying to, anyway. So I dug out the lateral thigh trainer with optional upper body power cords and the DVD of my old friend who has not changed a bit in the last year since I last exercised with her, Brenda Dysart, encouraging me with a simple workout.

After five mins into the workout, the optional upper body powercords bloody well snapped and I smashed myself in the chin.

Question: WHY has this happened when I was trying to be good!

Grrrr

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...