Jump to content

Recommended Posts

no facebook is not on the work pc its using it at home but having friends that i work with on my facebook, we have been told we are not to have certen people on our face book who no longer works with us , but this person is still my friend alltho she no longer works with the company .
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15051-is-it-right/#findComment-396854
Share on other sites

Hay hay - it's a question of whether it is against the company's interests for you to communicate certain information to particular individuals via FB. For instance, if they catch you posting to FB (and you have friends who are clients or potential clients) 'Work is rubbish, I hate it and my colleagues are idiots', they would probably have grounds to discipline you.


So, unless you are doing anything on fb that could be perceived to be not in the best interests of the company, or are adding friends that are purely work related (clients exp) then I very much doubt they can interfere with what you get up to in your personal life.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15051-is-it-right/#findComment-396874
Share on other sites

Most firms have a "reasonable usage" policy regarding their IT equipment. This means they reserve the right to monitor which sites you visit on their equipment as it remains the property of the firm and they have the right to know what that equipment is used for. This may include social networking sites such as Facebook, Bebo, Myspace, Twitter etc.


However, as this is on a home computer it is unlikely that they have the right to tell you who you may chose as a friend on such sites unless your actions bring the firm into disrepute or are not compatible with your continued employment with the firm. If you were to publicly criticise the firm or any of its employees, particularly by name, that could well come under the policy. Unless your ex-colleague did something heinous then it seems rather heavy-handed and intrusive of them to say the least.


If you had a known terrorist as a friend or a person who the firm categorised as being injurious to their business then then that might be regarded as an infringement of your contract of employment, eg: an animal rights protester if you worked for a pharmaceutical company. Why not just make your account private? A recent case in the US involved a private message on Facebook, and if memory serves the company were told to mind their own business.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15051-is-it-right/#findComment-396885
Share on other sites

Go to your settings. Deny any kind of access (most importantly your "friends list") to people you aren't directly connected to. The default is that friends and photos are visible to friends of friends and maybe even to outsiders. Next, limit some of your profile visibility (the friends list again and in some cases even wall posts?) to colleagues and ex colleagues you are connected to. As long as your friends/comments aren't visible to a random member of the public I think it's none of their business who you talk to, unless you're in a very high security job.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15051-is-it-right/#findComment-396900
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...