Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's relevant to seek information on serious crime

> if it's in your community.


I agree with that. But my comments regarding mawkish behaviour was for others who as far as I know aren't residents in the vicinity.


Specially when silly knee jerk comments are made or ones deliberately heating the facts for effect.


I wish you well.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> intexasatthe moment Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You're right Alice ,not really an occasion for

> nit

> > picking .

>

>

> Therein lies the rub, the description of crime as

> an 'occasion' like it's a visiting fun fair.

>

> It's a murder, not something to fish for

> information at for vicarious pleasure or make

> comments like "gosh, did I miss the memo" or "Not

> too stressed to film though.."

>

> And I'm not sure Alice's "We all seem to care so

> much" comment was meant to back anyone up.

>

> I suggest you go back to the beginning and read

> the Met's memo on the OP's link. There's nothing I

> see there that suggests people aren't assisting

> the Met in all the ways they can. But the

> following posts are revealing of knee jerk

> prejudice in such cases, with the assumption that

> 'people' aren't assisting the Met

>

> Rah-rah heated the info up to serve a purpose

> unknown, and from there it snowballed into

> Turtle's snide comment that was short hand for

> what I said above.

>

> However, as I said previously. It's mawkish in my

> view to seek info on incidents that don't really

> have anything to do with you, or at it's worst

> it's "virtue signalling" of which nobody likes to

> be called out for.

>

> And yes, harsh as it is, I stand by my comments.

> This news you seek isn't a form of arms length

> entertainment. Let the Police do thier job, and if

> your unsure as to what goes on, then sit back and

> keep you 'sympathies' in check, and maybe reflect

> on doing something useful with them.


Agree. There are quite a few rubberneckers out there, virtual and real.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's relevant to seek information on serious

> crime

> > if it's in your community.

>

> I agree with that. But my comments regarding

> mawkish behaviour was for others who as far as I

> know aren't residents in the vicinity.

>

> Specially when silly knee jerk comments are made

> or ones deliberately heating the facts for effect.

>

>

> I wish you well.



Who are you suggesting are 'not residents in the vicinity'?

Is it possible to view this forum without stumbling over posters who seem determined to take public offence at every single opportunity ? someone somewhere said something about someone doesn't mean you have to fill the thread full of pearl clutching theatrics.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A video has found its way on to YouTube. I

> despair.



An event in a public space gets uploaded to You-Tube and you dispair. But you're alright with heating the event with your own spin in the first place.



>Posted by rahrahrah April 30, 06:48AM


>People watching and filming, but haven't talked to police. Ffs.



The Police made an arrest within a relatively short space of time, but you can't of actually know if anyone had or hadn't spoken to the police when you posted the above.

I fail to see how you can criticise another poster for commenting on two threads related to recent stabbings as being mawkish, but defend people filming such events (surely more mawkish). I haven't 'heated up' anything, I just expressed a degree of shock that people who had stood around watching and taking pictures hadn't gone to the police. I accept your point about the potential effects of witnessing such an event and hope people might come forward in due course.. that's a fair comment. But the fact that footage has now found itself onto YouTube is disgusting.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Filming a murder and then uploading it to YouTube.

> Yes, I despair at that. You think it's fine?

> Someone's death as entertainment?



I didn't say it was fine. I made the observation on your original post, and I've not commented either way on the upload.


The rest of your post/s you've gone along on your own assumptions.




And I stand by my comments previously made.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...