Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not art deco, but interesting none the less. It was a commercial building designed by the architect John Outram in 1987. Outram is still very much a maverick polemicist in the profession and has designed some truly remarkable buildings (look up The Judge Institute of Management Studies in Cambridge). It certainly wasn't one of his best, but it probably had more thought and passion put into it than a thousand other 'light industrial units' around the country.

Old warehouse next to swimming pool




Hairdressers' warehouse shop doesn't look Art Deco



Not sure which one John is referring to - he knows his architecture so maybe he's thinking about something else.


-----

incidentally, the "back to the future" feature of Google maps also shows the old Monkey Puzzle tree which was a favourite of my son. It was overwhelmingly big for that front garden ...)


They would struggle to put together something uglier and less in keeping with the area. Not that I suppose that matters to the developers. As for the hair products emporium, it was originally a Victorian era stables with the subsequent addition of some WW2 bomb damage, as with much of the area. Not art deco. But still lovelier than what is being proposed.

I never understand what people mean when they complain new-builds aren't "in-keeping" with the area. Are we talking about architectural style? Surely nobody is advocating mock-Victorian buildings. Or are we talking more about the height of the building?


As it goes, I think the new flats look quite smart - as does the leisure centre next door.

  • 3 weeks later...

The site was 203-205 Crystal Palace Road.


The photograph from 2008 that Mike found was the earliest I have seen.


The abused building has still has sufficient diagnostics.


If anyone has an earlier photo, or took a destruction in progress photo, I would like to see it/them.


There is still a standing similar building at 6-12 Grove Vale.

I have photos of this site from the 1990s (I am not going to dig them out and digitise them, that would be a project in itself to trawl through my attic) however the facade has not changed since 1990 when I moved nearby.

The only change in appearance has been the endless cycle of graffiti / over painting.

Nevertheless, I think 'art deco' is an overly genuine description of what was there until a few weeks ago !


Currently the site looks like this (see photo attached).

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I never understand what people mean when they

> complain new-builds aren't "in-keeping" with the

> area. Are we talking about architectural style?

> Surely nobody is advocating mock-Victorian

> buildings. Or are we talking more about the height

> of the building?

>

> As it goes, I think the new flats look quite smart

> - as does the leisure centre next door.


It's not all about design bacaus I don't mind the design - it's the cutting corners.


New flats need some decent quality - chipboard floorboards in the bathroom now damp shredded wheat in mine :(

Not much Art Deco about Domino's Pizza! And it's been renovated and altered so much I'm guessing just the external brickwork and perhaps roof is all that remains of the original. When I first knew it, it consisted of three separate shops - was that how it was originally?
  • 2 weeks later...

mikeb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Domino's displays neither art nor deco.

> At most, maybe Streamline Moderne?


This morning I was driven around the most obscure of East Dulwich backstreets in search of remnants of Streamline Moderne.


Zilch.


The Grove Vale building seems to be the sole survivor and we should treasure it.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No curved edges



This book:


https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bombay-Art-Deco-Architecture-1930-1953/dp/8174364471/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1497254444&sr=8-1&keywords=bombay+art+deco


is good on the absence of curves on the most prestigious of art deco buildings.


You s should be able to borrow it from Southwark Libraries.


The afterward by Abha Lambak explains the book was partly put together to support a World Heritage Site listing for the Bombay "Art Deco Cluster!.

The book isn't shown on Southwark Libraries catalogue and the link you included shows the book currently to be out of print but as an observation only, and probably a very superficial observation at that, India has a long tradition of assimilating other cultural influences to create something uniquely Indian.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless you are watching it 24x7 then its hard to qualify that its not being used. Unless you are a business overlooking it of course. Personally I am reassured we still have phone boxes as they provide a valuable emergency use. If you are mugged for you phone, you can call 999 from them, if your house or business is on fire and you run out without a phone you can dial 999 from them. Some people don't have a mobile so its potentially reassuring for them knowing they can call someone if they feel unwell whilst out.  Just because some people don't see value in an object, doesn't mean others don't.
    • Hardly a non-story @malumbu still one of the lead stories on the BBC.....you clearly don't understand when to serve humble pie! 😉  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgk40l8jm7o   Absolutely. It's a disaster. And for this government, who were happy to tell us they had 14 years to prepare to lead, it has been one self-inflicted disaster after another since they took over. To be honest the signs were there when they were in opposition but I think we all gave them the benefit of the doubt as they weren't the Tories and now they have the reigns the additional scrutiny that brings is tripping them up.    
    • I don't think I've ever seen it used other than for gluing advertising on it. It's definitely not a priority but these things typically get ignored and become part of the furniture (so to speak).  There is a beautiful old red box near Upland Rd. I miss old red boxes... 😞 Anyway I'll have a dig around and see if anything can be done. 
    • £30-40 for M&S Christmas food for two seems very low! And only £60 for food and drink for 8-10 people?  We have had M&S food at Christmas in the past, and it came to a lot more than that. I suppose it depends exactly what you are buying. We left it late to book a Christmas Day meal out last year, so there weren't many options left.  The Cherry Tree menu looked very nice. That was our first mistake. We also overlooked the fact that it was a Young's pub, with all that implies about the food. That was our second mistake. We don't have shedloads of money. We  took the view that we deserved a nice meal  out after working bloody hard all year. So it was doubly disappointing to basically waste a lot of money which could have been very much better  spent elsewhere.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...