Jump to content

30% Cuts to Services in Southwark: Join the Southwark Save Our Services Campaign


Recommended Posts

I got this email notification yesterday. If you're concerned about the forthcoming cuts to services, please sign up.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Southwark to cut 30% from its budget

Join the resistance with Southwark SOS


Southwark council faces a 30% cut in funding and is at this moment planning to slash 500 jobs and untold services. Many people with serious mobility problems and/or visual impairments which make using public transport unfeasible have already received notification of cuts to the Taxicard scheme, and other vital services will follow. It is frightening.



However, there is a tide of resistance and Southwark Save Our Services campaign is uniting council workers, community groups, disabled people, tenants, pensioners, college and school students in a campaign against the cuts and to fight for more resources. We did not cause the financial crisis and we don't want to pay for it.



If you would like to be kept in touch, please email [email protected] and ask to be put on the email list. You will then be kept in touch about activities and lobbies taking place to defend our services and benefits. It's not all protesting: we are making vibrant connections and getting very inspired to use our creativity in the struggle. Every bit of support and every bit of resistance counts.



You can find Southwark SOS on Facebook too.

If the council website is to be believed the cuts are circa 11.5% in 2010/11 and a further circa 7.5% in 2011/12. Given the nature of local government bureaucracy and some of the high increases in government grants to Southwark over recent years it is a racing certainty that at least some of those savings are capable of being found in the back room operations or projects of marginal value - reducing the annual reduction in frontline costs of essential services to low single figure percentages.


I am not arguing that cuts are necessarily a "good thing" or that it won't be hard - but hyperbolic statements about 30% cuts aren't helpful. What would be helpful is to have a coherent alternatives proposed and not simply opposition.


"We did not cause the financial crisis and we don't want to pay for it" is a nice, factually incorrect, slogan but not a policy.


Sure the banks were bailed out - but it is almost another racing certainty that the government will sell of its shares in UK banks at a minimal net loss or even a gain over the next 5 years. The entire country wallowed in increased government spending and easy money from 1999 through to 2008 - the reckoning had to come at some stage and it did. The price has been and is reduced government spending across the board to reflect a reduced tax take and the growing cost of government debt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...