Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mum of 3 girlies, your not alone in being 'flashed'. I live in that very same area, and up until a couple of years back,the same guy would repeatedly 'flash' at women, in and around the area. He would wait until you got to a distance where you could see him and just show himself. I have not seen him in a while so maybe he has been put away where he can seek some medical help for his disturbing behaviour. And i qualify to comment because my sister and i were flashed by this same guy on a quiet sunday morning.It still gets me angry every time i think about it!


The first time it happened i was so stunned, i tried to laugh it off, the second and third time i saw him, I called the police right away, because i wouldnt want my children, or any one elese's children to encounter him. He was quite clearly in need of some help.

Jeez, what makes someone want to flash their bits to innocent bystanders?! And what does it lead to? I grew up in the countyside in the south-east and was unwittingly exposed to (pun intended):


Man masturbating at a bus stop (I was 12), and

Man who stopped to help my friend and me with a bike puncture, took his willy out of his shorts..., we fled, and

Man on train with shorts on got his willy out.


At the time we were terrified but didn't tell our parents because we knew they wouldn't let us out again. Looking back I feel they were sad and pathetic. Okay, I understand mental health issues to some extent, but if I came across this now, near my son's nursery no less, I'd be furious. I feel for your wife peeps and hope she, and the old lady are ok.

I very much doubt whether children under 2 would be very much upset by the sight of a flasher, though they would clearly be upset if their mother appears herself upset, responding to her mood and distress. Very young chidren do not know enough about life to be worried about things they see (and they certainly wouldn't be aware of the implicit sexual aggression indicated by flashing). Psychologists anyway have argued that most people do not have memories which go back beyond the age of three (those that think they do often have memories of being told about things that happened earlier, or having seen early pictures of themselves) - it's a function of the memory re-organsing itself and (virtually) re-setting at the age of 3 or there-abouts. So I wouldn't worry about the impact of flashers on very young children - there shouldn't be any.


The standard response, by the way, by adults, of being flashed should be - "My, that looks just like a p***k - only smaller!".

Just by the by, the standard response of adults to flashers should be to ignore them and walk away. And then report to the police.


As louisiana saya, flashing can lead to more serious offences. Any response you give a flasher encourages them, as that's the reason they're doing it.

The psycho-pathology of flashing is, I suspect, somewhat complex, but may broadly be grouped into 3 areas (of which I have personal experience, as a recipient, not a participant) of the first two.


? Flashing as an act of aggression/ misplaced ?humour? ? frequently the flashers are drunk young men, and the act falls into broadly the same category as ?mooning? ? not essentially sexually motivated but a ?display? action of young adults showing their power ? may also (wrongly) be seen as a ?humorous? act (a way of showing off and making friends laugh)


? Flashing as a fetish act where the process of exposure offers some form of sexual gratification. This group (in my experience rather sad, elderly men) are quite catholic in their choice of victim ? it is their own exposure and humiliation which is the sexual trigger for them, they have made a fetish of their personal exposure. As exposure is their trigger these may well not go any further than flashing.


? Flashing where the person being flashed is the fetish object. Here the choice of victim (child, young adult, elderly person) is very careful ? and it is the person being exposed to who is the fetish object ? it is these in particular where the escalation being discussed on this thread is most likely and dangerous.


The somewhat flippant response I posted above is particularly relevant to the first of these typologies.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very young chidren do not know enough

> about life to be worried about things they see

> (and they certainly wouldn't be aware of the

> implicit sexual aggression indicated by flashing).


Though by the age of 5, you are certainly aware that something is wrong and that this is a form of aggression towards you (but you probably don't understand about flashers and the whole thing is bizarre and scary, particularly when accompanied by physical and verbal aggression).

My reaction was purely mine: there was nobody else around.


And as with Polly D, I didn't tell my parents; it felt at the time that *I* had done something wrong (and I had a father who was likely to explode against me). I don't think I understood at 5 that he was doing a thing that I could report in order to stop him doing it to others.

Louisiana wrote


Though by the age of 5, you are certainly aware that something is wrong


I entirely agree - it was the two year old 'victims' I was writing about - by 5 children are normally well aware when something is wrong, can certainly feel very upset and threatened by it, and are very likely to remember it, as you have done, although sometimes if sufficently traumatised (not a good thing) they may supress the memories.


I was flashed at at about that age, but I was more surprised and amused (the flasher was known about locally and was sad rather than threatening) - many of my friends had already been flashed at by him, I was quite glad I wasn't being left out. And it was at a distance (perhaps 10 yards or so) - he leaped out in front of me, flashed, then disappeared running off into bushes - so I was never close to him when he did it.

Louisiana I care not a jot for the armchair psychologist, news, views etc. What I do care about is the fact that there is a pervert walking the streets so thought it a good idea to warn.


In response we I get a book read synopsis from someone hiding behind a pseudonym telling me it's ok and my wife and kids should just ignore the local pervert.


Genius !

Peeps,


You post this on a public forum please don't get upset by the replies.

You sound educated enough to expect a mixed response.


Flashers are not a new concept, we all have our own encounters/ memories.

You're not the only person to have been flashed.

(which is how you're coming across right now)

Just a quick question: who do you ring if you see a flasher (not an aggresive/potential immediate risk)


I assume it would be Safer Neighbourhood Team (020 8721 2447) or East Dulwich Police (020 7378 1212) if your're in East Dulwich?


I was flashed at a few times when I was young and perhaps naively I just found it funny and never really thought about it. Which has reminded me when I was 18 at a petrol station at 5am the petrol station man was chatting to me on the forecourt and kissed me while I was filling up my car. I just pulled away and gave him my ?20 and went - it didn't even occur to me to call the police, but really that is quite disturbing and I should have told the police. I think sometime young people don't think about how a relatively minor thing such as flashing (not that flashing is OK obviously) could escalate if it's not dealt with.

sophiesofa, not sure who you should call...


I do know that there are websites out there that are kind of flasher-central, where they, flashers, exchange info about tactics with women and children, and where they post photos of reactions of victims (or rather photos of the offending part in the same frame as the woman/child and his/her reaction).


Blurgh.


So people should be aware that the flasher might be trying to take that kind of photo to share with his fellow offenders.

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do know that there are websites out there that

> are kind of flasher-central, where they, flashers,

> exchange info about tactics with women and

> children, and where they post photos of reactions

> of victims (or rather photos of the offending part

> in the same frame as the woman/child and his/her

> reaction).


That's terrible, never knew sites like this existed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...