Jump to content

Recommended Posts

nununoolio Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Although I do have to ask First Mate this. In what

> way is pointing out the council can't afford to

> take on several court cases 'scaremongering'. They

> would be criticised for wasting public money.


If there is a such a problem in the borough with so many wanting action then I doubt the council would be criticised for taking perpetrators to court and winning. Councils regularly have bulk days at Magistrates Court for non payment of council tax. I believe the costs for the application etc.. for summary charges do not exceed ?100 per individual. Why would this be different?


You did not say whether you think the council would have to contract PSPO enforcement out to a private enforcement company? This is what has happened elsewhere.

Probably 9-10 years ago, I vaguely remember a lady training dogs (and owners?)on that triangle of grass near Barry Rd. We were all for it and I took some of her cards to pass to dog walkers I thought might need her services. No idea why she stopped, but it certainly wasn't to do with the council.

> You did not say whether you think the council

> would have to contract PSPO enforcement out to a

> private enforcement company? This is what has

> happened elsewhere.


Not heard that this is in the pipeline or even being considered. I will begin to feel distinctly nervous if I do hear anything!

nununoolio Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably 9-10 years ago, I vaguely remember a lady

> training dogs (and owners?)on that triangle of

> grass near Barry Rd. We were all for it and I took

> some of her cards to pass to dog walkers I thought

> might need her services. No idea why she stopped,

> but it certainly wasn't to do with the council.


I understand it was the Council.

nununoolio Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > You did not say whether you think the council

> > would have to contract PSPO enforcement out to

> a

> > private enforcement company? This is what has

> > happened elsewhere.

>

> Not heard that this is in the pipeline or even

> being considered. I will begin to feel distinctly

> nervous if I do hear anything!


And with good reason Nunoolio. Hiring of private companies to enforce PSPOs is happening a lot elsewhere. The reason is that council do not have enough officers on the ground to enforce. Watch the Panorama (called Inside the Litter Police and using secret filming) earlier in the week.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nununoolio Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Probably 9-10 years ago, I vaguely remember a

> lady

> > training dogs (and owners?)on that triangle of

> > grass near Barry Rd. We were all for it and I

> took

> > some of her cards to pass to dog walkers I

> thought

> > might need her services. No idea why she

> stopped,

> > but it certainly wasn't to do with the council.



Good if Southwark council are all for allowing dog training to take place in the parks (as mentioned here by park warden), then could this be taken forward? The Kennel Club do a "good citizen " scheme which gives dog owners understanding of their responsibilities of dog ownership and basic training in dog handling. I do think the majority of dog owners are either responsible or want to be responsible, perhaps people new to dog ownership would really appreciate this?





>

> I understand it was the Council.

For those who believe that legislation will cure all ills, have you considered that dog walkers often walk around in twos or threes for companionship? This would result in more than four dogs in one place at one time, even with a limit to dogs walked per person in legislation. Is your answer to this to legislate against dog walkers being in the vicinity of other dog walkers? Gets to look a bit draconian, doesn't it?

As basically the problem of Dogs fouling the pavements and parks has already been up before Southwark council before and nothing has been done about it as yet!!!

I think people should name and shame. Someone must know or see which owners are responsible for which dogs.

I have two dogs myself and would never ever leave poop behind if they done it of course.

No excuse Dog poop sacks are free for Southwark residents available at Southwark Libraries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
    • Second time Aria has completed a plumbing job for me and both times he’s been polite. Communicative, kept to time and completed the job. He’s very helpful and tidy as well. First job was ball valve in water tank, not easy at all. He and his team were fantastic. This time kitchen tap cylinders replaced and tap tightened.  Much appreciated, Aria thank you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...