Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In many ways it's a great shame to see them go - despite being built of asbestos sheet they were a fine example of make-do-and-mend really working - 65-70 year life when it was only meant to be about 10 or less. My grandfather ended his life in one, having been bombed out of 3 houses in London (no insurance in war time of course). They were quite spacious and had a little garden (his, at least). Does anyone know if any are preserved now anywhere in London? There were many more in Underhill even 30 years ago.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In many ways it's a great shame to see them go -

> despite being built of asbestos sheet they were a

> fine example of make-do-and-mend really working -

> 65-70 year life when it was only meant to be about

> 10 or less. My grandfather ended his life in one,

> having been bombed out of 3 houses in London (no

> insurance in war time of course). They were quite

> spacious and had a little garden (his, at least).

> Does anyone know if any are preserved now anywhere

> in London? There were many more in Underhill even

> 30 years ago.


Excalibur Estate, Catford.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, the Council has waited until the last tenant

> is no longer resident - they passed away.

> They've nearly secured them - they had some

> squatters. They then propose to build some council

> housing.


How sympathetic you are James!

hammerman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James Barber Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes, the Council has waited until the last

> tenant

> > is no longer resident - they passed away.

> > They've nearly secured them - they had some

> > squatters. They then propose to build some

> council

> > housing.



>

> How sympathetic you are James!



What is unsympathetic about that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He looks like the human version of the 😡 emoji. I'm sure he's lovely in real life (whoever he is).
    • Absolutely, Insuflo I very much doubt that anyone other than football fans would have heard of Dyche, much less his views on false number nines, mobile centre halves  dropping into midfield or diamond formations. But all middle-aged, portly, bald, gruffly spoken football fans from north of the capital who eschew fancy Dan tactics for the traditional, English merits of 4-4-2 shall be deemed knuckle-dragging Neanderthals by the Wokerati and the Metropolitan Elite. They care not what his views are, only that he looks like the sort of person who may have them. It's political correctness gone mad. But they, unlike Dyche, won't have a pub named after them.
    • I'm afraid I have no idea who Sean Dyche is, but I'm sure I could research him (and his views on library refurbishment timetables, if any) on any of the Southwark libraries' internet access computers. Free for any library member!
    • So that suggests the consultations with 'community' are just a tick box exercise where information given cannot be relied on. Not a good look. I hope Renata Hamvas who is the local councillor, as well as licensing, finds a way to stop the wholesale, spreadingmonetisation of an important green space in summer. If they get this it'll end up like Brockwell Park before you know it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...