Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My son is in the process of making choices on the A levels he will take next year. He's very interested in art and design but at this stage not 100% sure what area of Art/Design he would want to study. He's keen to take A levels in art and Design Technology, but unsure what 2 other AS/A levels to choose. How do we find out what art colleges requirements are, other than a strong portfolio / sketchbook work? He's currently thinking about either Drama, English, History or Physics as his other options. Do most people still do a foundation course first? Any feedback very welcome, thanks!

if it helps (i did my alevels a wee while ago) I did art, photography, film studies & psychology...

I went on to study a very focused design degree (shoe design!) but started doing a fashion foundation beforehand. I did know I wanted to study some fashion based degree when I chose my A-Levels, but not what exactly.

To be honest I think it doesn't make thet much difference which A-Levels one chooses as long as you have art in there and yes I think foundation courses are not only what people do but actually very valuable time to be able to focus yourself on what exactly you want to study and where to do as there is so much choice out there.

Good luck to him

Hi

Most art and design degree courses will require a foundation course for entry. When I did my A levels I did Art, French and Theatre studies. For me, the foundation was a place to experience a wide range of art and design disciplines (far more than possible at A level) and it helped students to decide on which area to study at degree level. I had to show my portfolio at my interview for my foundation and the offer was only to achieve one A level (can't remember the grade needed).

Your son's art teachers should be able to advise him on foundation and degree courses and portfolio preparation. They will be art/ design graduates themselves.


Hope this helps and good luck to your son!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
    • And when did you become the police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner all in one, I don't think so. And get back to Lewes
    • Yes, it is just that the local demographic is soon to have a large shift and more late night shopping catering for student needs is likely to be very popular. Presumably the massive student lodgings development plans for Melbourne Grove will have catalysed the Londis application. Wasn't there also an application for a late night bar or club at some point round there? Still, all this will help turn Melbourne Grove North into a real 'vibrant, urban destination' and 'town centre' and, for sure, we can expect lots and lots of e- bikes and scooters to be 'parked' around the place. What makes me laugh is that not so long ago the smaller housing development in the same place was being marketed as wonderful select family homes in quiet, leafy MG, with a 'villagey' feel.  As a taster for where all this might lead, has anyone noticed the crumbling brick facing on the railway development, built not so long ago? You throw 'em up and they soon start falling down. The developers make loadsa money and Councillors get to tick their boxes.
    • Stereotypes are based on actual real behaviours.  They can be inappropriately applied to a whole group and can overstep the mark, potentially being offensive.  But comments made on Corbyn and some of his followers are often accurate.  That's not saying he didn't have some good policies, often picked up by the large parties, and is not principled.  I saw him many years ago at an event celebrating Tony Benn where he was excellent.  Perfect for a back bencher. The damage caused by his Brexit stance is difficult to reverse, even ignoring the vote and the outcome, there could have been cross party working and agreement of taking it forward.  And being an apologist for Russia is just ridiculous.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...