Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You seem to think I view the world negatively but I don't start many negative threads. I'm a happy bunny


And im only busting your chops as it was such a minimal post. No grudge here, i promise


I'd be surprised if problems happened at Palmerston or franklins but any other pub around the lane, I'd be less confident. Or the mag is ok with bookings too. Others tend to move things around pub style to accommodate drop ins

I guess the pub (or bar) is weighing-up the financial benefits of (eg) fourteen people who are definitely looking for somewhere to booze all night - against the possibility of someone else maybe dropping-in for one or two.



The former being the ones who (these days) keep the pubs open.. unfortunately / fortunately (depending on which way you look at it)

Ha! In my book, the words 'pub' and 'Lordship lane' are no longer compatible. No, most of the licensed establishments that line Lordship lane can only be best described as refurbished bistros that serve a variety of seaweed ales. My guess is that this new policy of booking tables is a fad that's been imported from Battersea and Clapham, and is being trialed in ED. Worry not, I'm certain it will fizzle-out in due course.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I guess the pub (or bar) is weighing-up the

> financial benefits of (eg) fourteen people who are

> definitely looking for somewhere to booze all

> night - against the possibility of someone else

> maybe dropping-in for one or two.


> The former being the ones who (these days) keep

> the pubs open.. unfortunately / fortunately

> (depending on which way you look at it)


unfortunately (in my view).


although I do question how often these people who book for 14 are actually doing this? Sure, they might guarantee a huge profit that night but are they regulars?


I agree with you atticus, I much prefer places that don't reserve seats. that sort of thing really gets on my nerves.


Unless of course, karter has invited me to the Palmerston? B)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, Persepolis definitely coming to SE22, we ate in the legendary Peckham branch last week and the Lordship Lane offshoot was confirmed. It will be called Simorgh. Doubt if the new one will have a roof terrace overlooking the Job Centre though! Review of the quirky original here. https://open.substack.com/pub/eatsdulwich/p/restaurant-review-persepolis?r=8oe6m&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
    • I wasn't suggesting they should be used as a fox deterrent service! I thought I had explained that in my post. I posted information about them and what they do because you had posted about The Fox Project!
    • No idea to both! Though I seem to be being allowed to react again now 👍 I'm working on it 😂 It distracts me from the many many more important things I have to do 🤣
    • Respectfully, the Fox Angels Foundation need all the volunteers they have to tend to emergency call-outs, & should not be used as a fox deterrent service unless the fox is in danger. Forward all fox deterrent concerns to Fox-A-Gon so not to overwhelm these rescues. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...