Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, looks like after implementing the North Dulwich/Denmark Hill parking zone that Southwark are moving onwards and upwards into other areas! Can see from the Bessemer Grange School area (where you can park before 12 noon or after 2pm) that Southwark have probably had complaints from people living next to Sainsburys or in surrounding streets near East Dulwich train station that they can't park their cars. It does seem a strange boundary that Tooley Street have made out but they must have their reasons!

hammerman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, looks like after implementing the North

> Dulwich/Denmark Hill parking zone that Southwark

> are moving onwards and upwards into other areas!

> Can see from the Bessemer Grange School area

> (where you can park before 12 noon or after 2pm)

> that Southwark have probably had complaints from

> people living next to Sainsburys or in surrounding

> streets near East Dulwich train station that they

> can't park their cars. It does seem a strange

> boundary that Tooley Street have made out but they

> must have their reasons!


It is all part of Southwark's master plan to make all roads revenue producing and get cars off the roads.


The top part of Chadwick Road/Grove Park in the plan is the last non CPZ not joined to the existing CPZ now they intend to make it part of the whole.


If you have more than 3 cars per household you will not get a permit for others according to the consultation papers.


Again a consultation is raised during the summer months.


Are these idea's raised to keep people occupied instead of getting rid of them because they have very little to do?


They will all go through regardless.

  • 4 months later...

Looks like it's going ahead...probably will now need a zone to fill in the remaining unmanaged bit between East Dulwich Road & Copleston Road.



From 365 valid responses representing a 15% response rate, 49% of respondents were in favour of a parking zone, 39% were against a parking zone and 12% were undecided.


We have recommended that a parking zone is implemented across the whole area operating Monday to Friday, 11am to 1pm.


https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/dogkennelhill/

...though it has to be said that the time chosen will impact commuters coming in to the area to use the station (if there are any) but not most casual visitors and shoppers, tradesmen etc. (apart from a long lunch break being required). In Ladywell the time chosen (apparently justified as excluding commuters wishing to use the station) is 9.00am-7.00pm Monday to Friday which is draconian.

Ah thanks for sharing the link.


I live on one of those streets near the station and commuter parking is becoming a bigger problem by the day. So implementing a parking zone from 11am to 1pm would address this and not impact local use too much, which is what I was in favour of.


So in this instance, I don't think it's a revenue raising exercise.

Its never a revenue raising exercise. This is a tired old myth. The council is prevented by law from profiting from CPZ enforcement. If anyone has any evidence that such profiteering is ocurring, then they need to speak to the police urgently as it is a criminal offence.


Dog Kennel hill is really suffering as a couple of extra CPZs have started recently. I was up there the other day and it was stupidly busy, with no parking spaces anywhere, mainly as its the last uncontrolled space left in this part of South London.

So implementing a parking zone from 11am to 1pm would address this and not impact local use too much, which is what I was in favour of.


It must be remembered that many people who service us in ED (in shops, cafes & restaurants, in schools, in the NHS etc. in lawyers and accountants etc. etc.) need to come in to ED and for many of them the transport system does not support an easy commute between ED and where they live - so they drive-in. They are commuters certainly, but for our benefit - we are the end of their commute. When I worked in another part of SE London my drive was 15-20 minutes - any public transport commute could not be achieved in under 90! (because I wanted to travel East - West - not into or out of Central London or the City). It also involved both buses and trains and 2-3 changes (depending on whether trains were running or not that day).

The majority of the problem for many of these streets near the station is with train commuters on Monday to Friday. I can't speak for every street in the consultation but definitely the ones immediately near ED station.


I get that it is an inconvenience for some local commuters as mentioned by Penguin68 but at least it's not all day restriction. And like I said local commuters on these streets are a minority. I know as I live near the station and see this.


There are still uncontrolled zones further from the station which local commuters can use.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am struggling to understand how Green policies translate to local issues? The Southwark Greens leaflet I received reads like a general wish list but is not locally specific. I know the same can be said of other political parties. What specifically are Greens plans for housing, protecting local parks, council tax, transport and roads/ pavement upkeep, CPZ/LTNs?
    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...