Jump to content

Recommended Posts

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A trap specifically mentioned to me was May

> plans

> > to negotiate a Customs Union/Regulatory

> standards

> > Brexit with Corbyn then next week state due to

> > ERG/Cabinet rebellion she needs a referendum

> > between that and a No Deal Brexit (so leaving

> the

> > deal as Corbyn's deal and Labour stranded).

>

> When would this rebellion take place, before or

> after a deal is approved by Parliament?...


Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe more sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap however much you hope it's honourable )...


https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe more

> sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap

> however much you hope it's honourable )...

>

> https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-

> statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap


EU very unlikely to accept short 22nd May extension, they will offer much longer and say if UK agrees deal earlier then that's great etc. Ian Dunt has since retweeted to this effect...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe

> more

> > sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap

> > however much you hope it's honourable )...

> >

> >

> https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-

>

> >

> statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap

>

> EU very unlikely to accept short 22nd May

> extension, they will offer much longer and say if

> UK agrees deal earlier then that's great etc. Ian

> Dunt has since retweeted to this effect...

> https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/111333208776609

> 3825


Well I'm glad about that. :)

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi cella rendalharris here thankyou for asking for

> me .but just in case we fallout I just like to say

> go fcukyour self. Thankyou ted.... I mean

> rendal.😉


Reported to Admin - mainly for being illiterate.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Lordy they've hit it off (Jez and Tez that

> is).

>

> https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-je

> remy-corbyn-says-crunch-14231757


I'm not bothered with what fudge they concoct, as long as this is true...

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently there's a video .showing soldiers using

> a Jeremy corbyn poster ,for target practice

> .brigadier nick perry said the army was taking the

> matter very seriously .and would fully

> investigate,why everyone missed


RH would have made mincemeat out of you which you clearly feel. You appear to be a hateful and hate filled sort.

Cells you couldn't be more wrong there are pictures in the papers today showing what I said.OK I added the last bit as a joke.fair enough your not amused .what with all that's going on in this country brexit shambles fatal stabbings crime in general .just a little bit of black humour .some people might find funny some not .

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know the 213th was just out of prison wearing a

> tag, but as we have a bye-election in Newport in a

> labour safe seat pending I'll take it.



Says it all that you are fine with a dishonest crook just out of prison exercising what was essentially the casting vote in Parliament to pass a bill you support. If you reflect on that and change your mind, do let us know, otherwise I don't think that position reflects at all well on you (or any arguments you might voice).


It's not like a dishonest football player obviously diving to get a penalty when if it's for your team you might sometimes tempted to say 'I'll take it'. This is not a game and it is rather more serious, surely?

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I know the 213th was just out of prison wearing

> a

> > tag, but as we have a bye-election in Newport in

> a

> > labour safe seat pending I'll take it.

>

>

> Says it all that you are fine with a dishonest

> crook just out of prison exercising what was

> essentially the casting vote in Parliament to pass

> a bill you support. If you reflect on that and

> change your mind, do let us know, otherwise I

> don't think that position reflects at all well on

> you (or any arguments you might voice).

>

> It's not like a dishonest football player

> obviously diving to get a penalty when if it's for

> your team you might sometimes tempted to say 'I'll

> take it'. This is not a game and it is rather more

> serious, surely?


As one broadcaster said yesterday this is what it's like to live through history and it's not nice.

That's hardly the point now, is it?


Although we disagree on a number of things re Brexit, I hadn't thought you were that way inclined. Appears I was wrong, which is disappointing.


So, in terms of unlawful/disgraceful conduct, is there nowhere you draw the line in terms of moral disapproval, provided you get the result you want?


Seems not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...