Jump to content

Recommended Posts

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A trap specifically mentioned to me was May

> plans

> > to negotiate a Customs Union/Regulatory

> standards

> > Brexit with Corbyn then next week state due to

> > ERG/Cabinet rebellion she needs a referendum

> > between that and a No Deal Brexit (so leaving

> the

> > deal as Corbyn's deal and Labour stranded).

>

> When would this rebellion take place, before or

> after a deal is approved by Parliament?...


Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe more sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap however much you hope it's honourable )...


https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe more

> sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap

> however much you hope it's honourable )...

>

> https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-

> statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap


EU very unlikely to accept short 22nd May extension, they will offer much longer and say if UK agrees deal earlier then that's great etc. Ian Dunt has since retweeted to this effect...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Here's Ian Dunt's version of the trap - maybe

> more

> > sense to it (but more than likely it is a trap

> > however much you hope it's honourable )...

> >

> >

> https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/04/02/no-10-

>

> >

> statement-look-out-for-theresa-may-s-no-deal-trap

>

> EU very unlikely to accept short 22nd May

> extension, they will offer much longer and say if

> UK agrees deal earlier then that's great etc. Ian

> Dunt has since retweeted to this effect...

> https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/111333208776609

> 3825


Well I'm glad about that. :)

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi cella rendalharris here thankyou for asking for

> me .but just in case we fallout I just like to say

> go fcukyour self. Thankyou ted.... I mean

> rendal.😉


Reported to Admin - mainly for being illiterate.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Lordy they've hit it off (Jez and Tez that

> is).

>

> https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-je

> remy-corbyn-says-crunch-14231757


I'm not bothered with what fudge they concoct, as long as this is true...

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently there's a video .showing soldiers using

> a Jeremy corbyn poster ,for target practice

> .brigadier nick perry said the army was taking the

> matter very seriously .and would fully

> investigate,why everyone missed


RH would have made mincemeat out of you which you clearly feel. You appear to be a hateful and hate filled sort.

Cells you couldn't be more wrong there are pictures in the papers today showing what I said.OK I added the last bit as a joke.fair enough your not amused .what with all that's going on in this country brexit shambles fatal stabbings crime in general .just a little bit of black humour .some people might find funny some not .

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know the 213th was just out of prison wearing a

> tag, but as we have a bye-election in Newport in a

> labour safe seat pending I'll take it.



Says it all that you are fine with a dishonest crook just out of prison exercising what was essentially the casting vote in Parliament to pass a bill you support. If you reflect on that and change your mind, do let us know, otherwise I don't think that position reflects at all well on you (or any arguments you might voice).


It's not like a dishonest football player obviously diving to get a penalty when if it's for your team you might sometimes tempted to say 'I'll take it'. This is not a game and it is rather more serious, surely?

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I know the 213th was just out of prison wearing

> a

> > tag, but as we have a bye-election in Newport in

> a

> > labour safe seat pending I'll take it.

>

>

> Says it all that you are fine with a dishonest

> crook just out of prison exercising what was

> essentially the casting vote in Parliament to pass

> a bill you support. If you reflect on that and

> change your mind, do let us know, otherwise I

> don't think that position reflects at all well on

> you (or any arguments you might voice).

>

> It's not like a dishonest football player

> obviously diving to get a penalty when if it's for

> your team you might sometimes tempted to say 'I'll

> take it'. This is not a game and it is rather more

> serious, surely?


As one broadcaster said yesterday this is what it's like to live through history and it's not nice.

That's hardly the point now, is it?


Although we disagree on a number of things re Brexit, I hadn't thought you were that way inclined. Appears I was wrong, which is disappointing.


So, in terms of unlawful/disgraceful conduct, is there nowhere you draw the line in terms of moral disapproval, provided you get the result you want?


Seems not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...