Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Lets see what happens with Catalonia - its very

> > complex - and I get the feeling Trump is going

> to

> > do something incredibly stupid soon (can't find

> > the old Trump thread) but he's said "this is

> the

> > calm before the storm" - some calm - maybe all

> > this is going to be overshadowed :(.

>

> Near the top of page 3...you posted the last

> comment :)

> Forget about Trump and his utterances (probably

> meant to be overheard) and get yourself down the

> pub and watch Wales with a pint in your hand...


We actually won too :)


I know it's the Canary (the left's Westmonster) but that look on Theresa's face on Chris Williamsons blog. Like an unhappy dog.


https://www.thecanary.co/uk/2017/10/06/labour-mps-two-minute-takedown-mays-speech-best-thing-youll-watch-week-video/

When I saw that the Gruniard had an article written by arch-Breixteer Bernard Jenkin, I thought why are they giving him such 'airtime'.

Then I read the article. And now I know why.

Welcome to the deluded, deranged world of the Brexiteer, where bluebirds hang out Snow White's washing and there's a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow...soon to be a crock of shit

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/08/brexit-treasury-eu-bernard-jenkin

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's so much in that article that beggars

> belief. He actually thinks the EU is at fault for

> not starting talks BEFORE A50 was invoked.

> WTF!..:)


Why do they assume EU's interest aligns with ours - we are beginning

to blame them for looking after their own interests.

So taking remain out of the equation, what mistakes have been made since the referendum last June. I'd say quite a few (looking at it from the interests of the British side), the timing of article 50, the agreement of the sequencing (Davis said he'd fight this then rolled over on the first day), preparation (civil service needed more resources), negotiating skills.


There will probably be an inquest into how this was managed at some point IMHO and the government can't just say "we were following the will of the people" - a lot of decisions other than "leave" have been made.

I think all mistakes can be neatly summed up as "lack of any sort of a coherent plan". The whole thing is a complete shambles. The negotiators have gone in with the same foolish thinking that was voiced by some around this forum, saying, "ahh the EU will coming begging to us once they realise that the German car industry/French wine industry/etc will lose out".


Now, one third of the way in and we still have no plan, no strategy and, worst of all, no idea. Business is now getting jittery. It's not looking good.

And now Phillip Hammond (who is usually a relatively sane voice in the government) is saying he's putting aside money for a 'no deal'.


Erm - money is useful, but we are going to need a shed load of infrastructure in place ON Brexit day. Otherwise we will have no ability to process customs and immigration at our borders. This will take at least a year (and that's being generous) to put into place.


And that's just the start of it. Otherwise, the much-feared cliff edge becomes much steeper and much more deeper.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And now Phillip Hammond (who is usually a

> relatively sane voice in the government) is saying

> he's putting aside money for a 'no deal'.



This is yet another division within the Tory party... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41585428

PMQs was back to it's normal standard today.


Corbyn to May: You're on another planet, May to Corbyn: You're on Planet Venezuela. May even threw her notes over the table in annoyance when someone mentioned she was hurtling towards a no deal (answered "You couldn't be more wrong"


(instead of you, it was the right honourable member but that's a laugh)

Loz is spot on. Leave promised all sorts of things that are now being exposed for the folly many said they were at the time. I really do not know how the likes of Gove and Bojo can show their faces.


There was a very telling moment of the venom at the heart of the warring sides of the Tory party a few days ago when Rees Mog asked May a question on a couple of aspects of the negotiations and reliance on the ECJ in parliament. You could see the simmering hatred of her reply in his face and demeanor.


Until the Tories can find some consensus, we have no chance of any deal.


As for putting money aside for no deal, money for what exactly? To compensate business and those that lose their jobs? To offset inflation? To bribe offshore investors to use the UK as a tax haven? I thought we had no money - that's what the Tories have been telling us for 7 years now.

Interesting comment by the Speaker


"Commons Speaker John Bercow has said that MPs are not obliged to vote in line with the EU referendum vote.

Speaking to the Hansard Society, Bercow said it was an ?opinion, rather than a constitutional fact? that MPs were obliged to vote through Brexit because of the referendum result."


I thought there was no remain option in any vote, just deal or no deal. Does he know something then ?

Thanks for that article Loz. It seems to make perfect sense. The longer all of this nonsense goes on though, the more likely it is that we won't be leaving the Single Market or Customs Union. But as one journalist interviewing Iain Duncan Smith pointed out, that with every twist and turn of this game government are playing, the pound keeps falling and the economy tanks just a little more.

Or possibly the hardcore fringe of the Tories that controls May know all that, and would prefer the hardest Brexit possible to anything other than a perfect deal.


A cliff edge Brexit is still Brexit, so they still get what they want.


Personally I think it's all posturing for the medi, and the real talks are going on very secretly far away from prying eyes. We'll get what we're given, and will be told it's a good deal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Really? Yes you are probably right as I know from personal experience with Guys… as I claiming travel costs back, that no one told me I could claim! Left hand does not know what right hand is doing regarding admin..  If they charged people for wasting overstretched staff in A& E as in not urgent just might deter people from wasting precious time…. But then you need interpreters, to explain if language is a barrier and admin staff to administer..  Correct me if I am wrong but is there not a train from Denmark Hill or East Dulwich which goes to London Bridge? Would be faster than 2 buses I would have thought.    Oh, forgot about Tessa Jowell but thought you needed GP referral in which case, that would be the place to go rather than a bigger hospital. Know there is one in Beckenham and you can call and they will give you an idea as to wait time…..same I hope at TJ…assuming they answer phone.. If one really things about it…too many  people in London for example and to few hospitals…    
    • I don’t think it’s licensed for Sundays. It is licences for Fridays, but there hasn’t been anyone there on a Friday for years. So I doubt it. i think there’s a market at the Horniman on Sundays. Also pretty sure there’s one outside Herve Hill station on a Sunday.
    • I believe there is a minor injuries department at Guys, though I may have misremembered. Not very convenient for SE22 now the 40 no longer goes near. You have to get 2 buses or a train. Charging people (not sure if you mean financially or legally) would waste a lot more time, I would have thought? And  a bad bruise could be serious, depending on the cause and possibly other symptoms.
    • Good news - parliamentary debate scheduled for 19 January! Dear  Parliament is going to debate the petition you signed – “Limit the sale of fireworks to those running local council approved events only”. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/732559 The debate is scheduled for 19 January 2026. Once the debate has happened, we’ll email you a video and transcript. Thanks, The Petitions Team House of Commons
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...