Jump to content

What are the rules/rights regarding gates between houses?


Recommended Posts

Hello EDF's,


I'd like some assistance/direction from those in the know to help me understand the rules and rights of house owners when it comes to the gates that are fixed between them. Here are two scenarios:


1. Between two detached houses there is a gate that has been affixed for more than 15 years (before the current neighbours moved in around 10years ago). The gate is used to enter the left hand (homeowners) building down a private side entrance. The gate hinges are attached to the right hand (neighbours) building. In the last month they are complaining that the gate is vibrating their home. No works have been done on the gate. Outside of trying in-situ solutions, could the neighbour insist on having the gate removed?



2. Between the same two detached houses a wooden gate was put up towards the back of the building to enter the back garden. There was a previous old gate there many years ago. Again the gate hinges are attached to the right hand (neighbours) building. The gate has been in place for almost a year. The homeowner did not ask permission to add the gate, but assumed (wrongly or rightly) that it was a replacement and added some level of general security. Could the neighbour insist on having the gate removed?


I'd like to understand what the rules/regs/usual rights are to these scenarios.


Thanks,

OD

If the gate was fixed to your neighbours house more than 20 years ago you will have acquired a right of easement. Any less then you haven't and they can insist you remove it. But for security reasons you'd think they'd want to keep it as long as you stop the vibration problem. I'd try and do something about that first before worrying too much about the law.

You can have a solid post and a locking gate without a receiver attached to the other property, hung from your side. It'll be a metal gate and post with securing mechanism.


I'd personally try and resolve it by rehanging the hinge side post onto your property. If you want to be resonable and retain security offer the first solution, with the second as back up.


Good luck

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...