Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it because you have a problem on the line and they are telling you that if it's not their problem, you'll have to fork out ?150?


This happened to me a year or so ago and to my grandmother last week. In both cases, we followed their test process through the master socket (the details are online on how to do it) and still had the problem so called them out regardless. Since I knew that all my extension cabling had been put it by them, I figured it was still there problem.


In both cases, it was a problem outside where the wires had corroded. In my case, I had data and no voice, in my grandmother's, she had constant interference. We didn't get charged at all.


The engineer told me that the reason for introducing the charge was because they'd had lots of callouts for people with dodgy DIY cabling (inferior cable quality, bad routing, too long, too many extensions etc) who'd try to cut corners for cost - and were having to fix them free. The charge is supposed to stop that happening. If you're pretty confident in your wiring (other than whatever fault you have!), then I'd do the master socket test and call them out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...