Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We're thinking of getting a nanny (either live-in or out, and are happy to do a nanny-share) from September for our 2 month old, but as my wife is a teacher we only need someone for term times. Does anyone know if this is possible, or do most nannies prefer work for the full year?


Thanks,

- Steve

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15888-nanny-advice/
Share on other sites

There are some full time nannies who have their own children of school age. They would absolutely love a job that let them have their holidays with their own children. However, you would need to come to a special arrangement about holiday pay. I can imagine that a really good, experienced nanny (which is what you want) will not want to earn very much less than she would from a more full time role. You may have to pay her for a good slice of the time she has off. But you never know. Try websites that allow you to post a very personal add, and give a really good description of what you want. There's a good site called "findababysitter.com" that I've had a lot of luck with.

The alternative would be to go for a series of temp. posts during the terms. But that won't be much fun. OR you could try checking in with a New Zealand or Australian nanny agency. Lots of women in their early 20s come over from Aus/NZ on a special type of working holiday visa. Their real aim is to travel lots in Europe - so they want long holidays - but they are more than happy to do child care to fund their trips. In NZ and Aus you need a licence to be any kind of child carer and the training is pretty rigorous. A Kiwi/Aussie who wanted to travel would probably also accept most of the holidays as unpaid too. This could work really well as a live-in arrangement, which always saves the nanny loads of money, and allows her to use your home as a convenient base for travels. (Live-in nannies also expect to earn 15-20% less per hour too, which helps you too.)

Hope this helps.

WM

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15888-nanny-advice/#findComment-412849
Share on other sites

AS above, search for someone with their own school age children who needs to take the schoo hols off. Offer a small bonus to be paid in eg Sept of each year to ensure she does come back to you. Do not pay her her salary or part of it while she is not working for you, why on earth would you? BUt demonstrate commitment via the bonus idea, which is what most women with school age children will appreciate. They aren't flighty or silly and want commitment back. Fair enough.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15888-nanny-advice/#findComment-412947
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...