Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SEan,


It's not "bonkers" to point out that Ireland's politicians and their endemic cronynisim with business engineered a huge property based boom on the back of low interest rates that were set by ECB in the 90s and '00s to suit France and Germany but that did little for the smaller fringe states of the EU. I would agree that once the crash hit some of the political decisions - particualrly the one that guaranteed all Irish bank debt were foolish but the seeds of the disaster were, indeed, set many years ago.

maybe true quids but none of that has much to do with the EC


ireland's croneyism and corruption go back way further than any of that


But the dark miserable place Ireland was before it joined the EEC? If anyone wants that they are indeed barmy


Besides, it's not just this post - silvefox generally makes me wonder

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:


Sean - Quids & I sometimes agree, sometimes disagree. We are not the same person tho'

-------------------------------------------------------

> maybe true quids but none of that has much to do

> with the EC

>

> ireland's croneyism and corruption go back way

> further than any of that

>

> But the dark miserable place Ireland was before it

> joined the EEC? If anyone wants that they are

> indeed barmy

>

> Besides, it's not just this post - silvefox

> generally makes me wonder

"...some of the political decisions - particualrly the one that guaranteed all Irish bank debt were foolish..."


Tricky one this. The question is what would have happened if the Irish government hadn't made this guarantee? Bankruptcy obviously. The Irish people losing all their savings? Also, many mortgages in the UK were taken out with Irish Banks. Would thousands of people here have lost their houses?

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "...some of the political decisions - particualrly

> the one that guaranteed all Irish bank debt were

> foolish..."

>

> Tricky one this. The question is what would have

> happened if the Irish government hadn't made this

> guarantee? Bankruptcy obviously. The Irish people

> losing all their savings? Also, many mortgages in

> the UK were taken out with Irish Banks. Would

> thousands of people here have lost their houses?


Much, indeed probably the majority of the Irish bank debt, was held by institutions and other European banks. Many of those institutions and banks were also in debt - to have their Irish bank loan guaranteed was better than they expected, they would have been making provision for bad debt but suddenly didn't have to. Ireland could probably have got away with just guaranteeing personal debt.

Whatever your views on the banking crisis silverfox, it's clear that any link to the EC would be tenuous.


I just don't accept that the world before social strategy and progressive politics entailed a society of happy-go-lucky hobbits basking in the late summer sunshine as their wheatfields swayed in a gentle breeze.


The world before democracy entailed diseased indentured impoverished serfs who lived a life of indescribable malnutrition and slavery until they died before hitting forty.


They would have hated it.


Your comments on Ireland reveal a very poor insight into Irish society, and an almost delusional view of their history.

"... impoverished serfs who lived a life of indescribable malnutrition and slavery..." didn't know any different - that was their lot.


Ireland has lived high on the hog and seen how sweet life can be thanks to cheap loans and low ECB interest rates and now a couple of generations will be sacrificed to pay the bill.

Ireland indeed was a dark and dispairing place, but I dont agree it brightened up beacause of the Euro thing.

The youngsters of Ireland came alive when they had Boyzone and Westlife, that shook up those old men

that preached death and mayham all their young lives.

They were sick of it and just wanted to live their own lives, to be young ,to dance and sing without being in some

religous staitjacket.

They made Ireland and the rest of the U'K rock, not the dictatorial Europe gang.

The money gleaned by religion in that counntry is another thing keeping it poor. Joining the Euro was a mistake. as the saying goes the proof is in the Pudding.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...