Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My baby is now 6 months old and has made the grand move to his big-boy cot. He's all tucked in there nice and tight, fast asleep.. and then I go and read the internet. I was given a cute cot bumper by my aunt, and thought nothing of it. But apparently they are not recommended for babies under 1 year old? Due to risk of suffocating? And overheating?


It's all I can do to run in there screaming and rip the bumper off the cot...


Does anybody have any thoughts on this? Do you use one? Do you not? I'm unsure whether this is just another one of those things that I shouldn't really listen to. And as always, I'm an over-worried first time mother.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16216-cot-bumpers/
Share on other sites

I used one for my first child (now 4) as we were given it by in-laws, although most nights she ended up in bed with us and a big duvet anyway! Number 2 (6 months) sleeps happily in his big cot without any bumpers. I'm sure your little one will be fine with the bumpers, but to be honest I'm not sure I really see the point of them - a bit fussy and unnecessary. I think the reasoning is that it's best to go without so that air can circulate freely etc.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16216-cot-bumpers/#findComment-418819
Share on other sites

Just make sure it's tied down securely, flush to the side of the cot and can't ride up or become loose. I've always used one from about 4-6 months when baby was moved to cot bed. I've also read stories saying they are dangerous I suppose because baby can smother his face with it if he manages to wiggle towards it (but after the fact). Living in a Victorian period house we get plenty of air circulation!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16216-cot-bumpers/#findComment-418863
Share on other sites

I was on the FSID website the other day and they seem to imply cot bumpers used to be 'not recommended' but have changed their stance - see here; http://fsid.org.uk/page.aspx?pid=412


They say:


Bumpers: there are cot bumpers in the cot. In the past, there were concerns that bumpers might make babies too hot, increasing the risk of cot death. However, research has shown that they have neither good nor bad effects. Take it out when your baby can get up on her hands and knees so she can?t climb out. Make sure there are no trailing strings or ties.


Hope this reassures you. I think FSID is the best place to check this stuff as they are always most up to date.


xx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16216-cot-bumpers/#findComment-418982
Share on other sites

I was also wondering the same and found a safe cotbumper option. They sell it in Jojo Maman, if you look in their website it's called Airwrap - may have it in stock at the ED branch but otherwise it's free delivery on the website and at ?26 for the 4 sided option, it's the cheapest I have found it.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16216-cot-bumpers/#findComment-419153
Share on other sites

I have just bought an Airwrap from eBay (brand new though!) and decided I don't want it and am going to get a more traditional bumper. Does anyone want to make me an offer - if so drop me a PM?! It's still in its packaging and it is the 4-sided version. It was about ?26 as suggested incl delivery. I know I am not supposed to sell stuff here, but given the topic, I hope I am allowed?!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16216-cot-bumpers/#findComment-419212
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...