Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found out I am pregnant two week ago. I phoned my doctors to make an appointment and was told rather than see them at the surgery, I should self refer myself to King's online and they would contact me directly.


They've beeen in touch and I'm booked in for a scan in September - at which point I estimate I'll be twelve weeks.


My question is, is this right that I don't see anyone before this point? This is my first pregnancy and in addition to not knowing what to expect and being naturally anxious, as it early days we're keeping the news on the down-low and therefore don't really know anyone close enough to ask.


Thanks for reading and if anyone can my mind at rest, I'd appreciate it.

Get back in touch with your GP or Kings to express your concerns and request clarification. You should be able to see a midwife or GP before your scan, to address your concerns and to help you understand the process for antenatal appointments and care.


And congrats on your pregnancy! xx

Agree with Saffron that it's a good idea to get back in touch for some clarification. Was it the GP or reception staff who sent you straight to the hospital?


TBH, I've always found the system in ED a bit confusing as different things seem to happen in different surgeries. I'm sure there's nothing to worry about - you're clearly in the system if booked for a scan, but agree seems unusual not to see a midwife before that.


Good luck - and congratulations!

Hi Pollypops,



I also recently self-referred to Kings as I wasn't local in my first trimester (now in 2nd) and I was amazed that at no point was I asked to show "evidence" or provide a wee sample, etc! You're basically believed and are left to stick it out until your scan unless there's cause for concern. As the others suggested, I would call your surgery to clarify or the midwifery unit at Kings. I've just checked my Kng's maternity folder and the first midwife appointment listed is the Booking appointment at circa 12 weeks for samples and initial check in. This is done separately to the scan.

Early essential reading for me included How to grow a Baby and Push it Out (written by a King's midwife, covering what to expect in NHS system) and Expecting Better which covers the first trimester in a lot of detail.


Congratulations and good luck! PM if you'd like more info.

Hi Pollypops, I'm currently pregnant and I was referred to Kings by my GP. My first midwife appointment was at 8 weeks. It might be different across areas, or maybe you'll get your midwife appointment letter in the post soon. You can contact the midwives office to check: 020 3299 3246. Congratulations and good luck with your pregnancy!

** Update **


I arrived home this evening to a letter telling me I have a midwife's appointment in two weeks.


Perhaps it's the hormones, but I probably should have been a little more patient before getting stressed and anxious.


Once again, thanks to those who took the time to respond.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...