Jump to content

Recommended Posts

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well....what did they say Nette?



1. Most Scottish people have rotten teeth because of the sugar boilers of Glas'gie.


2. If you like cheap chocolate, you're common.


3. Buy more sweets, we need the dosh.


4. Don't leave your child with a hot kettle.



I think that just about covers it.



Nette:)

I went into H&G recently and asked about ingredients in the boiled sweets (the ones in the big jars) and they didn't know. They offered to make a phone call to find out, which was nice, but the answer I got in the end was that they're made in a factory somewhere and bought in and they don't know the ingredients. It gave me the impression that H&G is just about the pretty packaging, which can't be right as I'm sure the additive-conscious folk of ED wouldn't be buying them for their little ones in that case.


Does anyone know - can they really just be buying in from some big industrial supplier or did I just get the wrong answer? Would love to know as I really fancy some rhubarb and custards.

Clearly I was naive but, yes, I thought they either did make them themselves and/or source from small, independent manufacturers who use traditional recipes without all the modern gunk! Oh dear. Will have to go to Waitrose (the supermarket that dare not speak its name on this forum) and get them there.

I do think they make some of the sweets themselves, but there's no way they'd be able to make them all. Surely all the "classics" (flying saucers, cola bottles, rhubarb & custard, etc) come from the standard suppliers.


Who cares about the additives, as long as you eat them in moderation? Sweets are not supposed to be healthy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...