Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have put the same post up twice on this board today and twice it has been removed. The first one was moved to the Lounge (and is now marked as closed) and, thinking it was my error, I posted it again here couple hours ago - again it has gone. Have I inadvertantly caused offence or done something inappropriate? It was a question about the area around the Bredinghurst flats. Thanks.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16353-where-is-my-post/
Share on other sites

This section is 'ED Issues', but it was referring to an area outside ED, so I imagine that was why it was moved to the Lounge.


When you posted it again it was still in the wrong section, and it was a repeat post which is widely considered to be spamming, so it may have been removed for that reason.


Don't worry about it, it's nothing personal, just the administrators keeping the place tidy.

Well I think you were referring to the 'area around Camberwell Old Cemetery' which may not be considered so much ED as perhaps Honor Oak or Forest Hill?


It will have been a close call. Even having said that it should probably have been in the property section.


But this thread is still in the wrong place - it should be in 'About this forum', so I wouldn't be surprised if it gets moved also. ;-)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It will have been a close call. Even having said

> that it should probably have been in the property

> section.


I think that section is more for rentals/sales, not really general discussion.


Camberwell Old Cemetery is literally on the SE22 border, so it seems harsh to move it.

Well I probably wouldn't have moved it, but rules often get interpreted arbitrarily. Thems the breaks.


Once it had been moved the repeat posting was definitely breaking the rules, as well as being a tiny bit rude. It would have been a little bit wiser to enquire after the original move rather than jam it in again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...