Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Couple of doors down students are in the garden all night burning (seemingly) whatever they can find. Last week it was an old bed, which they broke up and used for firewood. Obviously we all live in a smoke control area, but can anything be done about burning dangerous materials? Does the council have any enforcement powers? The smell was acrid and flooded into our house. I don't want to be a killjoy and understand a drink around a fire but this seems to be taking the piss.

If they are tenants, contact the landlord?


You could also try reporting it as antisocial behaviour? http://www.southwark.gov.uk/noise-and-antisocial-behaviour


It does seem to be illegal and could incur a fine... http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/info/200075/pollution/254/penalties_for_polluting


I think similar to other types of antisocial behaviour, the general advice is to keep a diary of all the activity as this will support your complaint. Good luck. xx

If you told them that their actions can cause some people with breathing/lung problems to get very ill they may get the message. You shouldn't have to tell them that - they should be alert to their general anti-socialness but if you need extra persuasion, it could work.

From Southwark Council's website page 'The main causes of air pollution': http://www.southwark.gov.uk/air-quality/the-main-causes-of-air-pollution


'Bonfires


Bonfires and any burning in the open generate smoke and odour. The plume will affect neighbouring properties making health issues worse, spoiling washing, preventing the enjoyment of gardens and outside spaces, making people close their windows, etc.


Do not dispose of waste by burning. The whole borough is a designated Smoke Control Zone. Instead, re-cycle as much of your waste as possible.' (last updated 29 August 2017)

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for that IlonaM.

>

> If you read the text more carefully it does not

> say bonfires are banned.

>


That was my understanding as well. It's not the bonfire itself that is illegal.


It would the burning of "toxic" materials (or materials that release toxins) that is illegal, or if the fires were considered to be a "statutory nuisance".

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for that IlonaM.

>

> If you read the text more carefully it does not

> say bonfires are banned.

>

> Mr Barber will probably not the e4xisting

> restrictions and exemptions for bonfires.


I did not assert that bonfires are banned edhistory. I posted what was on the website for your information.


Somewhere on the Southwark website it used to talk about frequency etc. in terms of nuisance, but I cannot find it at the moment. Perhaps you can?

Bonfires are not banned, but burning items that produce acrid toxic fumes is. If this happens call Southwark Environmental services and they will come and inspect. Yes do they do have powers to stop such instances and will do so when they are made aware of them.

Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...