Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry VillagerId but that's crap, no-one has done anything on the sly, there have been 4 meetings, each attended by about 50 to 60 people who actually bothered to turn up, and express their opinions rather than moan and bitch about it, without actually bothering to turn up.

There's lots about it in this thread here


But mainly it means that the school comes out of Southwark control and becomes a company limited by guarantee and a charity receiving funding directly from the Dept of Ed. The school doesn't have to contribute to the local authority wide fiund to pay for shared services and canchoose what services it opts into. The main financial reason given at the meetings I attended was that there was a short window of opportunity to derive maximum benefit from this non-payment to the council. It is not clear how long the advantage will remain.


In terms of regulation it is no longer inspected by OFSTED and is not subject to normal oversight by the charities commission as it will be an "exempt charity".


There's lots more and, as I said, I think its set out in some detail in the other thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...