Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My son (who is definitely well on his way to outdo his big sister) has been refusing to go down for a morning nap.

He used to nap for about 45 minutes at around 9am (then down to 30 and recently 10 or nothing at all).


He usually gets up between 6 and 6.30 and is out of bed and active by 7am. Yet he fights having a nap tooth and nail and frequently wont sleep till 11/12 or much later.


I think 5 months is too early to drop this nap. How on earth do I get him to sleep? Barring going for a walk and that doesn't even work half the time.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16628-5-month-refusing-morning-nap/
Share on other sites

Hi SG, I agree 5 months seems a bit early to be dropping the morning nap. My son always does a 30 min nap or takes ages to settle when he's overtired. Could you try putting him down a bit earlier for a few days, say 8.30am, just to try and claw back some extra sleep? It might take a good few days of doing this before he decides he might want to try it!


I know by 8.30am my 1 year old is ready for a sleep, especially if his night is disturbed or he's had a few days of rubbish napping. Once he's back on track and caught up I can go back to putting him down nearer 9/9.30am. Maybe worth a try?


Caveat - its only my experience, it might not work and many others may say drop the nap etc!!

x

This used to happen to my daughter from time to time. In our case it has been just a phase she went through periodically. I wonder if there is a developmental link? There have also been rare times when she wouldn't nap all day. She'd go through one of these dry spells for some days, then a new nap routine would sort itself out. It might just be your son's body trying to adjust to a new sleep phase? xx

Hello,

I have been wondering about this daytime sleep thing too.... my little one (now 7 months) has not been sleeping much in the day at all for quite a few weeks, probably since she turned 5 months. She has been having two 30 min sleeps per day, the first at around 11:30 am and then the second at 4pm ish. Recently there have been days where she just has one lunch time sleep.

I can't spend too much time "helping" her to sleep in her cot, last time I tried - my 2 year old emptied a large bottle of water over his bedroom carpet and washed his teddies in the loo.

Peppa you made me laugh. Quite a feat.


I wanted to add that any other naps last exactly 30 minutes unless out in pushchair (but even then only about 45 minutes). It is driving me round the bend. I picked him up and tried to breastfeed back to sleep to break the cycle and he was comatose on the boob. Minute he was in cot, wide awake. Tried shushing and patting for 20 minutes before giving up. Now want to scream

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...