King Size Mattress topper - Brand new ?40

By hannahkaty
September 8, 2017 in For Sale & Items Offered

Recommended Posts

hannahkaty

Posted September 8, 2017

- Share

Posted September 8, 2017

Hi,

I have a brand new lightly used Slumberdown mattress topper available for sale.

I bought it two weeks ago for ?74 but will happily take ?40 for it. I'm only selling because i've now purchased a new bed and mattress and this wont fit.

It comes with a carry bag (pictured) but as you can see from the picture I can't quite fit it back in the bag since it was removed!

Collection from SE15

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/166369-king-size-mattress-topper-brand-new-40/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Rhythmic gymnastics - East Dulwich
  
  By ingava · Posted 7 minutes ago
  
  We are excited to announce a new rhythmic gymnastics group! 🎀✨ 📅 Thursdays | ⏰ 5-7 PM 📍 Harris Girls Academy 👧 Ages 7-10 Join us for fun, flexibility, and new skills! Book your FREE trial now! 💫💪 www.gymnasticselegance.co.uk
- Derelict Grove Tavern - who to contact?
  
  By jazzer · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  I "BELIEVE" theres a huge one, ginormous In Burgess Park.
- Baby-Friendly Screenings at East Dulwich Picturehouse – Too Restrictive?
  
  By TheOG · Posted 2 hours ago
  
  I agree it is odd. This is why I have contacted the cinema’s management via email. Right now, they are implementing it by not showing films with a maturity rating of greater than PG.
- Baby-Friendly Screenings at East Dulwich Picturehouse – Too Restrictive?
  
  By Sue · Posted 2 hours ago
  
  That seems really odd. Was it really after just one complaint to the council? Do the council have a say in the cinema's policies? You would think that if the Picture House agreed that this change in policy was reasonable, they would apply it to all their cinemas. What is the upper age of the children at the baby friendly showings, or is one not specified? I'm not sure how I feel about the actual policy, I'm just surprised about why and how it has apparently been so suddenly implemented.

Sign In