Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there


I'm in need of some advice. I received jury summons through the post today. I have a 10 months old child. My husband works full time and can't take time off to look after our son for unknown amount of time as he runs his own business. We have no family around either who could help us out.


Anyone got excluded from jury service because of small children?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/166486-jury-summonscan-i-skip-it/
Share on other sites

See: https://www.gov.uk/jury-service/delaying-or-being-excused-from-jury-service


You would have to make a very good case on the reply form. That may include getting confirmation from your husband's employer that he cannot take time off work. They might allow for a deferral until a later date if you can make a good enough case. Why not give them a ring a discuss it before you return the form (just be aware of penalties for late return etc.)

I think with such a young child you stand a very good chance. Put it all in writing and apply. Are you still breastfeeding? I'd emphasise the sole carer of child first - and refer to her/him as a baby (they are) rather than child. Make the argument it's not in the baby's well being to be upset by short term care scenarios when they aren't used to anyone else but you. Then raise the family's sole income aspect. Think about whether you'd be prepared to defer and says so (although if you don't go back to work you might just be in the same situation in 12 months)..,.


In my experience they are understanding and reasonable...

Just to note - remember it's you (not your husband) that's been called. So I don't know if you would be able to claim the fraction of his income as expenses, he'd be paid for childcare (at their rate).


So make the point that the loss to you is far greater. But focus on you and YOUR reasons for not being able to do it.

I got called for jury service whilst on my last maternity leave. I was allowed to defer. I wrote saying I was on maternity leave and still breast feeding and that my child was not yet in nursery etc. The deferral was only for about 6 months and happened to be about three weeks after I went back to work! Not the most convenient but at least my little one was in nursery by that point and they paid for her additional days.

Thanks for the responses. I will definitely call them first thing on Monday.

I've read it on other forums that people with babies got exclusions (or at least being able to do it at later time) but let's see what they say. Hopefully I will talk to a nice and understandable person.

My husband was excused from jury service when I was heavily pregnant. He was self employed at the time and our baby was due a couple of weeks after his jury duty was due to start. It was the third time he had been called for jury service and he hasn't been called since.
I was called for jury service while at university - it came to my home address and my mum opened it up and turned it down on my behalf (thinking about it - that's probably illegal) and without telling me until a long time afterwards - saying I was studying in a different city and my studies would be affected if it was a long-running trial. I was disappointed when I found out and have never been called on again - or that I know about :)
Usually you can defer once. If you attend you can make a case to the judge but it's very intimidating and there really is very little chance. When I did mine (same circumstances as you) the judge didn't let someone who had a two week trip on Thailand for their family booked off the hook.
Well in the form they say booked and paid holidays are fine so they let you to defer. I think mothers with babies should be excluded from jury service completely without even have to explain themselves. Why do I have to be forced to leave my child with a stranger when he never spent more than 2 hours away from me and even then he was either with his dad or grandma. Anyway...will know more tomorrow (hopefully)

Yes. They will let you defer once in your circumstance or with a holiday. But not the second time. The second time you have a chance to talk to the judge. From watching many of my co jurors walk up to the judge at the front of the court to ask permission to leave, he was very very strict at this point.


meli Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well in the form they say booked and paid

> holidays are fine so they let you to defer. I

> think mothers with babies should be excluded from

> jury service completely without even have to

> explain themselves. Why do I have to be forced to

> leave my child with a stranger when he never spent

> more than 2 hours away from me and even then he

> was either with his dad or grandma. Anyway...will

> know more tomorrow (hopefully)

You should be excused indefinitely. I did jusry service a few years ago, and I have 3 children. The administrator handling the claims for compensation for costs was really surprised that I was there, and told me that almost no-one with young children actually does jury service in London because the compensation rate for childcare won't cover the cost and it leaves you hugely out of pocket.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
    • That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’.        Brexit happened Sue.  Boring graphs!  Calling Nigel Farage a plastic patriot is also very insulting seeing as he and the Reform Party have had a landslide victory all over England.
    • These charity collectors are often classed as chuggers.  It can be scandalous that the charity/admin may keep a huge percentage of your donations and a tiny percentage is  actually given to the charity.   I can not speak for individual collectors - but it common practice.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...