Jump to content

After school nanny needed


LoulouCmoi

Recommended Posts

Hello,


We are urgently looking for an after school nanny / childminder to pick up our two delightful (no, really) children aged 4 and 7 from a local school and bring them home for some engaged play, 'homework' support, tea and bath. Hours are 3:30 - 6:30 Mon and Tuesday and 4:30 - 6:30 Wed and Thursday. Happy to be flexible / provide extra hours for the right person. Please message if you are interested with a bit about yourself.


Many thanks,


Laure

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/167434-after-school-nanny-needed/
Share on other sites

Hello!My name is David & up until July I had the pleasure of caring for 3 little Princes aged 9 & a set of twins aged 6.

Unfortunately for me their Mother has adjusted her working schedule so no need for me anymore boo hoo!

But that means I'm available to look after your delightful offspring-yay!

I come with excellent references & children just love me!

I look forward to hearing from you.

Hello my name is David Bailey-Emerson from Jan-July this year I looked after 3 boys aged 9& 6 I collected them from school & provided their evening meal.

I would supervise their homework & clean the house.

Their parents working arrangements have been adjusted so no need for me at the moment,I come well recommended with excellent references-please contact me on 07941377715

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...