Jump to content

Good deal at Tesco, including online!


Sue

Recommended Posts

I rarely shop at Tesco, but I do have a Clubcard.


Every so often I get sent vouchers, and I just assumed they were probably all long past their sell-by date, apart from one or two I've used in Oxford. I certainly don't have them any more.


BUT via info from a site from the MoneySaving Expert newsletter I've just found out I've got ?14.50 worth of still useable vouchers, dating back to May 2009!!, and not only that but through some system I don't understand, you can double the worth of the vouchers up until 5 May for things you buy either online or instore, and you don't need to have hard copies of the vouchers!.


I've got ?29 worth which is lucky as my microwave has just stopped heating or defrosting anything and I need to get a very cheap one very quickly :-D


Some things aren't included but microwaves apparently are, hooray, and there's one for ?33! Though the amount you can use in vouchers varies from department to department, and in this particular department you have to use multiples of ?10, so I'll have to spend the other ?9 elsewhere .....


Here's a link to a page explaining it all, but I don't know whether you have to sign into the site first to get onto the page.


http://www.tesco.com/clubcard/clubcard/bigexchange.asp#bottompane


You have to go into "my Clubcard account" to find out what you're owed, ignore the bit at the top which may tell you you have ?0, you have to scroll down to the section headed "Vouchers you still have to spend".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Tesco is a tiny little local Tesco which only sells food.


I don't think this thread is relevant to it in the least, and had I put it in the ED business section I'm sure it would have been lounged.


If Admin think it should be in a section relating solely to ED, they can move it there.


Why are you so concerned?


ETA: If you look at the link, you will see this is about things sold by Tesco like clothes, electrical goods etc etc. OK I expect you can use your tokens in a tiny little local Tesco, but that isn't what my thread is about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue, you should check whether you'll get change back from the vouchers you use. To buy the ?33 microwave using ?20 worth of vouchers could mean losing ?7. Alternatively, if you use one ?10 voucher, there'll still be ?13 to pay. Also, make sure you're exchanging your older vouchers first, I think they're valid for about 18 months or so.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, according to the website yes you get change back in points.


But for this particular department I can only use vouchers in multiples of ?10 so I'll only be able to put ?20 towards it anyway, and pay the rest in cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> What's this thread about, I read Tesco and glazed

> over.



xxxxxxx


Why even bother looking at the thread then, let alone bother to post on it :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annette Curtain Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > What's this thread about, I read Tesco and

> glazed

> > over.

>

>

> xxxxxxx

>

> Why even bother looking at the thread then, let

> alone bother to post on it :))




I'm not posting per say.


( or looking at it again )


Nette:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per se.


For itself, or in itself. Perfectly valid to argue that it wasn't a post per se. You'd need to redefine what a 'post' was and introduce a degree of relevancy.


You could then argue that its lack of relevance meant that a post it was not. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Per se.

>

> For itself, or in itself. Perfectly valid to argue

> that it wasn't a post per se. You'd need to

> redefine what a 'post' was and introduce a degree

> of relevancy.

>

> You could then argue that its lack of relevance

> meant that a post it was not. etc.


Yeh...


That's wot I meant


N:-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We were hoping to have a meal at Monkatsu  last night (Sunday), after having been out all day. Online information gave the closing time as 10pm. We got there around 8.30pm and they wouldn't give us a table because "the kitchen closes in half an hour." Surely it doesn't take half an hour to make a meal? We've never had to wait that long when we've eaten there before. Has anybody else had this happen? We ended up going home and getting a delivery, which wasn't how we had envisaged the end of a nice day 🙄
    • That place did only have pizzas on the menu, to the best of my recollection. We ate there once, the pizzas were ok but the room was not exactly atmospheric. Il Mirto has  a lot of pasta dishes on the menu,  but that also never seems busy. It's small and out of the way,  and easily forgotten if you're looking for somewhere to eat, I suppose.
    • London's Fallen. The Mayor, was, is and will remain a disaster for London "Sadiq Khan’s legacy: 772 six figure earners in TfL alone, 18 TfL employees on over £250,000 Sadiq paid himself £171,587 in 2022-23, up £21,000 from four years ago, What do you get? 4.99% council tax increase, ULEZ tax, Mayoral tax doubled to £471, Knife crime up, Acid attack capital of the world, Shoplifting up 48% Muggings and picketing up x3 He’s filling his mates and his own pockets, laughing at you in his bullet proof Range Rover Sentinel paid for by the taxpayer." "More than 1000 of his City Hall staff are on a salary of £100,000 or more per year" So were is the value of money in that , and you know what, we all pay for it from our council tax. More administration and more of a burden on the people. He is out of touch with reality.  And as for Susan Hall, her campaign was only about Ulez, it was the only thing she ever brought up, when London has so many other problems that she didn't ever mention once. Her hope was that the voters in the outer London Boroughs would get her over the line, she failed miserably.   And why does the new mayor think Londoners should provide school meals for children, not his, or our responsibility, or does he now control the running of schools as well.  And as for air quality, its been proven Ulez has made practically NO difference. Where is all the money he's generated, certainly not back into London, otherwise he wouldn't have raised his part of the council tax for 2024/25 by 8.3%. WE pay more and get less each and every year.  Well if that's the case, the scrutiny of borough councils needs to increase 1000+ fold and be held to account for the actions they take and the decisions they make.  His "winners" speech was no more than hot air, saying how he represents all Londoners, I'll tell you what, lets switch Mayors and have Andy Burnham, Manchester can have Khan, At least Burnham is a proper politician with proper values who actually cares about people.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...