Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I understand this was briefly discussed a few months back, but not since then (apologies if I may have missed more recent discussions).


AFAIK they're building two new developments in the area: one is the so-called Tribeca, by the gym on Crystal palace road, and the other is literally next to the ED station - there will be a M&S simply food on the ground floor.


Has anyone been in touch with the estate agent?

Thoughts on the two developments?


I saw ads of one-bed flats for ?475k at both. I understand new builds tend to cost a bit more, but that seems ridiculous. My benchmark is ? 480 to 550k for 2-bed flats, e.g. I have seen ads of decent 2-bed flats, with communal garden and parking space, in Hayes Grove (a few metres from the ED station) for ?530. That's the asking price - what they really sell for I don't know.


Plus, while the Tribeca should at least have some communal green space, the other one is so close to the station -literally next to it - you can probably hear the announcements. Maybe I'm stingy, but I know I'd want a discount to tolerate noise from the station!


It will be interesting to see if/when/how these units sell. I have seen other properties (not newbuilds) being discounted by 20% and still not selling. I imagine that, at the end of the day, with newbuilds it will all be driven by the kind of financing developers have in place, and therefore how low they can bear to sell.

I wouldn't have thought noise generated from East Dulwich station would be too much of a problem, doors are not slammed shut and the trains themselves are quiet. With double glazing it would all be very muffled. Some would in fact see being in such close proximity to the station as a selling point.

The ED station isn't too bad because AFAIK all the trains that pass by stop there, so if you're next to the station they will be either accelerating or decelerating, ie slow either way. Plus being close to the new Charter secondary will be a plus for many.

I have seen properties next to stations on the Clapham Junction to Croydon line, and those tend to be cheaper because they're much noisier from all the fast trains speeding by without stopping.


However, this new build is literally next to the station, so there is a chance of hearing all the announcements.


Oh, well, it's a free world, if others want to pay close to half a million for a one-bed there, it's their right! :)


Also, asking price doesn't necessarily mean sale price!

  • 2 years later...
Back to the Tribeca I'd be interested to know how many have actually sold? Of the 20+ units there were a hew under offer when this thread was started as I remember it, I think one house and three flats. And one flat had exchanged. I think there'd been a screw up on the houses which had been marketed as freehold but turned out to be leasehold (after exchange) and this was down to their being built on top of the car park which sits under the majority of the site. The flats were all leasehold and looked very pricey but still sellable, then apparently the developers/development went into receivership. Presumably it was all sorted as some of the units are still for sale.

I think it's just slow times in the property market. Too much uncertainty. There are some perfectly good Victorian houses in ED and PR that have been on the market for absolutely ages... just not enough people willing to buy at the moment, with a stagnant economy, foreign investment slowing, cutbacks in The City, and Brexit looming over us like a dodgy uncle.


I'm quite keen on the Tribeca development (despite the daft name)... IMO it's a nice looking building. Was just built at the worst possible time.

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For a while now the scaffolding has returned over

> the whole of the flats so presumably something

> needs correcting or maybe not properly finished if

> the original developers went into receivership.

> Just looks very shoddy.


We've got scaffolding over Co-Op because our cladding is being replaced as it was marked up as not meeting the new demands.


I think it's similar for a lot of flats.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, Pugwash. That's really useful information. Do you know who was responsible for the locks and keys, or which council department? Could you PM me if you don't want to put someone's personal details on here?  It may save me having to speak to Monica. Thanks.
    • Does anybody know why? Trees aren't cut down for no reason. There must have been something wrong with it (I hope that was the reason). A child was recently killed and another one injured when a tree fell in a park (not in this area). It isn't always obvious from the outside when a tree is diseased or whatever, and I imagine the council would give safety considerations priority when deciding what to do, if there was any doubt at all.
    • It looks like they have cut it down completely now 😭
    • Different people will be  involved within Thames Water. The people dealing with the leaks aren't the people encouraging less water usage. How many people have reported the Barry Road leak? By what channels? What response have they had? When we had a leak in our road which meant we had no water, several people reported it, there was good communication with TW, they explained why they couldn't come out immediately (other urgent jobs elsewhere in the area) , kept  in touch with us and fixed the leak within a reasonable timescale (hours). Someone from TW also contacted me later to make sure my water was back. But does Thames Water know about it? They aren't psychic (I presume). If nobody reports it, I also presume they won't even know the leaks are  there, unless they have some kind of central monitoring system which tells them when there are leaks in the system. To make it clear, I am not defending Thames Water as a company, which I think should never have been privatised.  But there are some things they can't be blamed for (old and disintegrating water pipe system in London) and some they can (possibly, lack of sufficient staff to deal with leaks, maybe due to trying to save money to give their shareholders more. But this is just surmise on my part - I know nothing about Thames Water).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...